Reaching For The Moon

“Liberty may be endangered by the abuse of liberty, but also by the abuse of power.” James Madison quotes (American 4th US President (1809-17), and one of the founding fathers of his country. 1751-1836) Thinkexist.com

I’m reviewing the lawsuit filed by the Obaminator and his corrupt administration.  Right off the bat thoughts of John Yoo came to mind.  You remember Yoo don’t you?  He was the attorney for dubya who justified the use of torture and indefinite incarceration for prisoners accused of terrorism against the united States.  Of course, in the Obama administration they just don’t watch or protect out borders so they can claim there aren’t any stinking terrorists here, until it is far too late.  In other words, I have no faith in our courts or justice in America after watching what has been going on in the past few years.

Obama Holds Southern Border Hostage

My reasons are very basic.  The first of which is that this administration has been picking and choosing which laws it wants to enforce and which it will ignore.  A lawful government doesn’t do that.  A lawful government works to enhance the country, the people, creating a sense of peace and hopefulness within its borders.  None of that exists today within the united States.

Video Fox News Kyle Takes On Napolitano

The second reason is that the courts have allowed a foreign government to submit an amicus curae, (literally friend of the court), which seeks to educate that court of the laws which are in doubt.  Mexico has filed an amicus curae in this case.  How are we to have faith in a court system when a foreign government is allowed to file such a brief in this case?  A case against a State of the union  Read it HERE: Mexicos friend of the court brief against Arizona (pdf document)

Third, the failure of the federal government to secure our southern border and our ports, willfully, abdicating their responsibility to the people of this country leaves no doubt where their loyalties lay.  And it isn’t with the people who elected them.

The fourth concerns recent decisions by the courts.  Cases such as that of David Olofson, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission,Ramos and Campean and others show the leanings of the court away from protection of our Constitutional protections and the rights, privileges,of the Citizens of this country in favor of corruption, er, corporations or did I just repeat myself?  This is NOT justice.  This is NOT law and order.

Judicial Watch has sent their views on this case out to the public for any wishing to read it.

Obama Administration Launches Legal Assault on Arizona Over Illegal Immigration Law

From the Desk of Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton

The government’s core legal argument centers on the Supremacy Clause, which, in short-hand, means that where there is a conflict, federal law trumps state law. And since illegal immigration, according to Justice lawyers, is a federal responsibility, the State of Arizona has no business sticking its nose where it doesn’t belong.

Of course this is a bogus argument. The courts have consistently held that states can, in fact, implement immigration-related laws, as long as these laws do not go beyond the dictates of federal law. The Arizona statute merely seeks to enforce federal law. Nothing more.

But if you really want to understand the Obama administration’s motivation for filing this lawsuit, check out this excerpt: If allowed to go into effect, S.B. 1070’s mandatory enforcement scheme will conflict with and undermine the federal government’s careful balance of immigration enforcement priorities and objectives.

Allow me to translate. If Arizona’s law is allowed to go into effect, it will interfere with the Obama administration’s decision not to enforce laws against illegal immigration! In other words, the Arizona law might just force the federal government to confront a responsibility that it would rather avoid. The term “mandatory enforcement” is a bit scary to the Obama administration when it comes to immigration law. (emphasis in both cases are those of JMT)

I vote NO CONFIDENCE in either our Court system or this administration. I think impeachment hearings for this squatter in the oval office need to be immediately put forth.  On an aside, I cannot reach the Judicial Watch website.  It seems the server is suddenly unavailable.  Gosh, wonder how that happened…?

You might also find these articles on Judicial Watch of interest:

CORRUPTION CHRONICLES

Arizona should sue Obama-It Is About Time

Expecting justice seems just a little far fetched today. I don’t know who is holding what gun to what head, but I do know that justice seems to have flown out the window where the past 3 administrations are concerned.

According to the case document filed with the court, you can read the following statement at the bottom of the first page and continuing on the second page.  To read the full court document click here: united States vs Arizona

2.   In our constitutional system, the federal government has preeminent authority to regulate immigration matters.  This authority derives from the United States Constitution and numerous acts of Congress.  The nation’s immigration laws reflect a careful and considered balance of national law enforcement, foreign relations, and humanitarian interests.  Congress has assigned to the United States Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Department of State, along with other federal agencies, the task of enforcing and administering these immigration-related laws.  In administering these laws, the federal agencies balance the complex – and often competing – objectives that animate federal immigration law and policy.  Although states may exercise their police power in a manner that has an incidental or indirect effect on aliens, a state may  not  establish its own immigration policy or enforce state laws in a manner that interferes with the federal immigration laws.

So, although the Obamination has declined to enforce the federal laws concerning illegal aliens and is holding that border hostage until he gets his amnesty bill, he will not  allow any State to make sure those same laws are enforced. Arizona needs to withdraw from the union of States and tell the Obamination to Eff the hello off.

I do not recognize this federal government as legitimate.  The feds are throwing the Citizens of this country under the bus in favor of foreign governments and their foreign citizens.  Any State which attempts to protect their Citizens or enforce federal laws will be taken to task.  Can you say UNCONSTITUTIONAL?  Can you say RICO?

Racketeering

Traditionally, obtaining or extorting money illegally or carrying on illegal business activities, usually by Organized Crime . A pattern of illegal activity carried out as part of an enterprise that is owned or controlled by those who are engaged in the illegal activity. The latter definition derives from the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corruption Organizations Act (RICO), a set of laws (18 U.S.C.A. § 1961 et seq. [1970]) specifically designed to punish racketeering by business enterprises.

Racketeering, as it is commonly understood, has always coexisted with business. In the United States, the term racketeer was synonymous with members of organized-crime operations.

Yes, I do believe we have an illegal government full of criminals that are working against the Citizens and States of the union.  I voted for an American Citizen, Cynthia McKinney, and not an illegal alien working for the CIA with 28 social security cards at his disposal. While the democratic party endorsed  Obama as their candidate of choice, they never vetted him. To my mind that means that Pelosi, Read, and Biden all know the Obamination is not eligible to be POTUS. And, if the Obaminator is not legally POTUS, that makes everything he has done, signed, approved, etc., null and void. I will go on public record here and state that I do not recognize him as President of this country until proof of his legitimacy is confirmed by sources I trust.  (Climbing off my soap box now…)

If this administration is illegitimate then this lawsuit means nothing.

The lawsuit claims that the new Arizona law, SB 1070 will bring, “a sweeping set of provisions that are designed to “work together to discourage and deter the unlawful entry and presence of aliens” by making “attrition through enforcement the public policy of all state and local government agencies in Arizona.”” (Lines 12 – 15 page 2)

We wouldn’t have to if the government did their job, enforced the laws already on the books, and served the people of this country instead of another government.  I guess that is too much to ask of the thieves in Washington DC.  It further states in the complaint:

See S.B. 1070 (as amended by H.B. 2162).  S.B. 1070’s provisions, working in concert and separately, seek to deter and punish unlawful entry and presence by requiring, whenever practicable, the determination of immigration status during any lawful stop by the police where there is “reasonable suspicion” that an individual is unlawfully present, and by establishing new state criminal sanctions against unlawfully present aliens. (lines 15 – 19 pg 2)

I have never been stopped by a cop and NOT asked for identification. So how is this different than any other lawful act by the police? The fact that they are then going to check the immigration status of those caught in an UNLAWFUL act, (caught committing and illegal act or breaking the law), IF there is REASONABLE SUSPICION, makes me wonder at the sanity of this lawsuit.  Is it me or is this just bullshit?

My sentiments concerning Obama's carefully balanced immigration policy...

The claim by the federal government that the enforcement of SB 1070 will be for attrition purposes ONLY and that it interferes with the federal governments REAL criminals is insane.  With an open border you can’t keep terrorists out of the country.  You can’t even tell if they have crossed the border or not.  Exactly what is their definition of a REAL Criminal?

Documented by the border patrol are illegal aliens from Afghanistan, Turkey, Iran, Guatemala, and many other known terrorist nations.  Many from the Arab nations.  These are documented intrusions.  Not my imagination.  23436612 (PDF doc.)  OF course now the federal government has banned these lists from being made public.  And why do you suppose that might be?

Full story, video and pdf documentation HERE:

Underneath this video is Channel 2 investigates Border Security Part 2.  Part 2 will lead you to the documentation that channel 2 acquired.

There is no question that the Obamination has been an utter failure in almost everything he has attempted to accomplish but most especially where our ports and borders are concerned.  His attempt to wash the egg off his face with this bogus lawsuit just shows what a petty thug he is.  He should stop using words he doesn’t understand, like attrition, and comparing Arizona with the War of Attrition, and concern himself with the welfare of America.  Certainly Mexico has no trouble doing this.  Calderon is all about Mexico’s superiority.

In the complaint against Arizona, the government makes the following RIDICULOUS CLAIM:

It will altogether ignore humanitarian concerns, such as the protections available under federal law for an alien who has a well-founded fear of persecution or who has been the victim of a natural disaster.  (lines 10-13 page 3)

How? Only in the COMMISSION OF A CRIME, can Arizona law enforcement stop and ask a suspected illegal alien for documentation.  < ROLLING MY EYES HERE >  The claims in the suit are ludicrous at best and a total fabrication at worst.  There is far more cause for examining The Obaminator’s status as an American than fact in this lawsuit.  With the courts refusing to hear any of those cases, I truly wonder if any judge is moral enough to even hear the case.

There is also a distinct conflict of interest here if you ask me.  One of the plaintiffs of this action is the Department of Justice under which all the judges and anything to do with justice is handled.  So, how exactly do you get a fair and impartial hearing???

This justice department is so huge that there are over 115,000 employees. Instead of the federal government hampering the States who are defending themselves and their citizens from the illegal invasion of Mexico into the united States, they should be supporting us. But that is Obama Hope and Change for you!  By the way, how’s that working for ya now?

Advertisements

~ by justmytruth on July 12, 2010.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: