Where is God in War?

So much blood has been spilled in the name of God. Each side, believing itself to be right, will find whatever form heaven takes if death comes before victory. How much blood is enough? How much does it take to satisfy the ONE GOD?

Whether your God is Christian or Allah, both claim that killing is wrong, that peace is what counts, and yet the blood continues to flow, and heaven, whatever heaven you believe in, receives them all. How much blood is enough?

And when that blood is spilled through the lies of men, how much is that sacrifice worth? Does it mean as much to God? Is the very killing that God says not to do suddenly all right just because you are fighting, especially for a lie??? Somehow I doubt it. And what of the religious leaders who challenge young men and women to die for their cause? A cause based on lies? How can we continue to look up to these men? How can they be speaking for God who has already said, “Thou shalt NOT kill!” Does it redeem the deaths of those killed because they died for something they believed in? Does it cleanse the soul of the killing they did before they died? Does it wipe away the memories of the dead and dying? Of the body parts that are blown away and the screams of pain? Will we ever learn what God wants us to learn?

War, and death from war, weaken us all. Killing hurts the spirit of man. It tortures the soul of all it touches. What is done can never be undone nor forgotten. You cannot unsay a word, nor undo a deed, nor can we make the dead live again. In our minds their ruined bodies will be the last memory we carry of our beloved, our friend, our family member, our son or daughter.

All for the sake and pomp of a few powerful men who think they can do these things. Mr. Bush claimed that al Qaida was responsible for the World Trade Center, but he lied. He claims that they are terrorists, but he lied. WE have invaded Iraq, we are the invaders, WE are the terrorists. So long as we remain, our young men and women will die in Iraq and so will theirs. And for what? Will oil wash the blood away?

Will al Qaida go away? Not likely. Yes, we got rid of Saddam Hussein, but then we set him up didn’t we? We, the United States of America GAVE him his power, his weapons of mass destruction, and then turned him into the tyrant he became. Yet we blame them for being terrorists? What is wrong with this picture?

I believe that God and Allah may be the same being. Their principles are so similar, though they are different. Each age has its leader and spiritual guide. Where are they now when we need them the most? There is something fundamentally wrong with the world today. We are all being lied to, each and every one of us on all sides. Man lies, to himself, to eachother, to everyone else. He is greedy, self important, and wasteful, so wasteful. Look at all the blood! The Earth is swimming in it, the violence and hatred so thick you can almost taste it. But you lied Mr. Bush. All these lives are on YOUR head. How do you sleep at night? All the leaders of the Earth who commit war, genocide, who spill blood. I say you are the evil in the world.

There are 3987 American lives lost Mr. Bush that you are directly to blame for and over 1,185,800 Iraqi deaths on your head! You are a very bad man, a very evil man. May God have mercy on your soul!

From CommonDreams.org we have this article:

Exhaustive Review Finds No Link Between Saddam and Al Qaeda
by Warren P. Strobel

WASHINGTON – An exhaustive review of more than 600,000 Iraqi documents that were captured after the 2003 U.S. invasion has found no evidence that Saddam Hussein’s regime had any operational links with Osama bin Laden’s al Qaida terrorist network.

The Pentagon-sponsored study, scheduled for release later this week, did confirm that Saddam’s regime provided some support to other terrorist groups, particularly in the Middle East, U.S. officials told McClatchy. However, his security services were directed primarily against Iraqi exiles, Shiite Muslims, Kurds and others he considered enemies of his regime.

The new study of the Iraqi regime’s archives found no documents indicating a “direct operational link” between Hussein’s Iraq and al Qaida before the invasion, according to a U.S. official familiar with the report.

He and others spoke to McClatchy on condition of anonymity because the study isn’t due to be shared with Congress and released before Wednesday.

President Bush and his aides used Saddam’s alleged relationship with al Qaida, along with Iraq’s supposed weapons of mass destruction, as arguments for invading Iraq after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld claimed in September 2002 that the United States had “bulletproof” evidence of cooperation between the radical Islamist terror group and Saddam’s secular dictatorship.

Then-Secretary of State Colin Powell cited multiple linkages between Saddam and al Qaida in a watershed February 2003 speech to the United Nations Security Council to build international support for the invasion. Almost every one of the examples Powell cited turned out to be based on bogus or misinterpreted intelligence.

As recently as last July, Bush tried to tie al Qaida to the ongoing violence in Iraq. “The same people that attacked us on September the 11th is a crowd that is now bombing people, killing innocent men, women and children, many of whom are Muslims,” he said.

The new study, entitled “Saddam and Terrorism: Emerging Insights from Captured Iraqi Documents”, was essentially completed last year and has been undergoing what one U.S. intelligence official described as a “painful” declassification review.

It was produced by a federally-funded think tank, the Institute for Defense Analyses, under contract to the Norfolk, Va.-based U.S. Joint Forces Command.

Spokesmen for the Joint Forces Command declined to comment until the report is released. One of the report’s authors, Kevin Woods, also declined to comment.

The issue of al Qaida in Iraq already has played a role in the 2008 presidential campaign.

Sen. John McCain, the presumptive GOP nominee, mocked Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill, recently for saying that he’d keep some U.S. troops in Iraq if al Qaida established a base there.

“I have some news. Al Qaida is in Iraq,” McCain told supporters. Obama retorted that, “There was no such thing as al Qaida in Iraq until George Bush and John McCain decided to invade.” (In fact, al Qaida in Iraq didn’t emerge until 2004, a year after the invasion.)

The new study appears destined to be used by both critics and supporters of Bush’s decision to invade Iraq to advance their own familiar arguments.

While the documents reveal no Saddam-al Qaida links, they do show that Saddam and his underlings were willing to use terrorism against enemies of the regime and had ties to regional and global terrorist groups, the officials said.

However, the U.S. intelligence official, who’s read the full report, played down the prospect of any major new revelations, saying, “I don’t think there’s any surprises there.”

Saddam, whose regime was relentlessly secular, was wary of Islamic extremist groups such as al Qaida, although like many other Arab leaders, he gave some financial support to Palestinian groups that sponsored terrorism against Israel.

According to the State Department’s annual report on global terrorism for 2002 – the last before the Iraq invasion – Saddam supported the militant Islamic group Hamas in Gaza, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command, a radical, Syrian-based terrorist group.

Saddam also hosted Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal, although the Abu Nidal Organization was more active when he lived in Libya and he was murdered in Baghdad in August 2002, possibly on Saddam’s orders.

An earlier study based on the captured Iraqi documents, released by the Joint Forces Command in March 2006, found that a militia Saddam formed after the 1991 Persian Gulf war, the Fedayeen Saddam, planned assassinations and bombings against his enemies. Those included Iraqi exiles and opponents in Iraq’s Kurdish and Shiite communities.

Other documents indicate that the Fedayeen Saddam opened paramilitary training camps that, starting in 1998, hosted “Arab volunteers” from outside of Iraq. What happened to the non-Iraqi volunteers is unknown, however, according to the earlier study.

The new Pentagon study isn’t the first to refute earlier administration contentions about Saddam and al Qaida.

A September 2006 report by the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that Saddam was “distrustful of al Qaida and viewed Islamic extremists as a threat to his regime, refusing all requests from al Qaida to provide material or operational support.”

The Senate report, citing an FBI debriefing of a senior Iraqi spy, Faruq Hijazi, said that Saddam turned down a request for assistance by bin Laden which he made at a 1995 meeting in Sudan with an Iraqi operative.

Earlier report from the Iraqi Perspectives Project

You do not deserve loyalty Mr. Bush, you lost that when you lied to us. You do not deserve the office you hold, you lost that right when you lied to us and American’s died. You have shed the blood of those you swore an oath to protect, AND YOU LIED. You deserve prison, not a cushy bed.


~ by justmytruth on March 13, 2008.

One Response to “Where is God in War?”

  1. Amen!!! The minute they invoke “God’s” name you should know right away it’s utter bullshit! How can a God that is all loving want this kind of destruction? Better yet, what kind of God claims to love un-conditionally then puts a bazillion conditions on that love?

    Spare me those who claim to be men of God, for they are all liars and cheats.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: