How To Impeach A Supreme Court Justice

An earthquake achieves what the law promises but does not in practice maintain - the equality of all men. ~Ignazio Silone

The shock waves are still running around the internet with the latest supreme court ruling.  Some are claiming victory for free speech, but they are working for the almighty dollar and have betrayed the foundations of this country.  But what most don’t realize is that the supreme court never decided the question which had been placed before it.  Rather it took it upon itself to answer something entirely different.  Does this invalidate the ruling?  Possibly.

The question that was asked and that we all expected an answer to had to do with: Was an ad concerning Hillary Clinton, (during the presidential campaign), a corporate campaign ad or not? That was the question which was NEVER answered with this decision.  Instead, the Justices decided to go off on their own, something they are NOT supposed to do, (did corporations have the right to freedom of speech), and consider something completely different.    The whole thing was way off base and against all precedence.

A copy of the supreme court decision/documentation can be found HERE:

A great interview to watch to get some in-depth legal views/opinions and perspectives would be this PBS special done by Bill Moyer’s Journal, video link below:

This is an incredibly important video to watch to understand the consequences of this decision and what has been stolen from us. In effect, the supreme court ruled that money can say what it wishes. Think of the pressure this will put on any of those lawmakers, current or future, who want to work for us against the power those with billions to spend will be put under. Will they really want to go up against these Goliaths? Could you or I stand against Goldman Sacs, Pfizer, Bayer Corp. or Monsanto? Do you think you would have a prayer in hell of standing shoulder to shoulder with these corporate bullies and come out walking upright? Not a chance.

If you would prefer, you can gain a copy of the transcript here:

So, what can we do now that the supreme court, at least 5 of them, have betrayed us and the Constitution and Bill of Rights?  We can impeach them.  Here are the steps necessary:

Can a US Supreme Court justice be impeached and removed from office?

Yes!

Under normal circumstances, a Supreme Court justice is awarded a lifetime commission.

A Supreme Court Justice may be impeached by the House of Representatives and removed from office if convicted in a Senate trial, but only for the same types of offenses that would trigger impeachment proceedings for any other government official under Article I and II of the Constitution.

Section 1 of Article III states that judges of Article III courts shall hold their offices “during good behavior.” “The phrase “good behavior” has been interpreted by the courts to equate to the same level of seriousness the ‘high crimes and misdemeanors” encompasses.

In addition, any federal judge may be prosecuted in the criminal courts for criminal activity. If found guilty of a crime in a federal district court, the justice would face the same type of sentencing any other criminal defendant would. The district court could not remove him/her from the Bench. However, any justice found guilty in the criminal courts of any felony would certainly be impeached and, if found guilty, removed from office.

In the United States, impeachment is most often used to remove corrupt lower-court federal judges from office, but it’s not unusual to find disgruntled special interest groups circulating petitions on the internet calling for the impeachment of one or all members of the High Court.

The Impeachment Process

Impeachment is a two-step process; the impeachment phase is similar to a Grand Jury hearing, where charges (called “articles of impeachment”) are presented and the House of Representatives determines whether the evidence is sufficient to warrant a trial. If the House vote passes by a simple majority, the defendant is “impeached,” and proceeds to trial in the Senate.

The Senate trial, while analogous to a criminal trial, only convenes for the purpose of determining whether a Justice (or other officeholder) should be removed from office on the basis of the evidence presented at impeachment.

At the trial a committee from the House of Representatives, called “Managers,” act as the prosecutor, and an “Impeachment Trial Committee” of Senators act as the presiding judges. This procedure came into practice in the 1980s, with the passage of Senate Rule XII, and has been contested by several federal court judges, but the Supreme Court has declined to interfere in the process, calling the issue a political, not legal, matter. At the conclusion of the trial, the full Senate votes and must return a two-thirds Super Majority for conviction. Convicted officials are removed from office immediately and barred from holding future office.

So what would be the articles of impeachment be for these justices?  How about betrayal of our Constitution?  What about graft and corruption?  The most important part of all this is to understand the difference between RIGHTS (see section 2) and PRIVILEGES!  Our rights was granted to us by our Creator.  A privilege is something that someone else, (person, congress, etc.),  gives us which can be withdrawn or taken back at any time.  The Declaration of Independence grants us nothing, it says that our Creator gave us inalienable rights.  The Constitution does Guarantee that those rights can never be taken away or infringed upon. Only evil men and women try to do that.  So long as we allow them to, or allow them to make noises like they can, they will continue to try.  And what does inalienable mean?

Main Entry: in·alien·able

Pronunciation: \(ˌ)i-ˈnāl-yə-nə-bəl, -ˈnā-lē-ə-nə-\
Function: adjective
Etymology: probably from French inaliénable, from in- + aliénable alienable
Date: circa 1645

: incapable of being alienated, surrendered, or transferred

— in·alien·abil·i·ty \-ˌnāl-yə-nə-ˈbi-lə-tē, -ˌnā-lē-ə-nə-\ noun

— in·alien·ably \-ˈnāl-yə-nə-blē, -ˈnā-lē-ə-nə-\ adverb

As you can see it is impossible for us to surrender that which our Creator has endowed, (given), us. Nor can it be transfered to something which is NOT human, or not created by the Creator, God, Allah! The supreme court justices who say they can give the freedom of speech to a corporation are off their nut and need to be placed in a good home somewhere to be cared for and medicated against their delusions for the rest of their lives. It is obvious that they are incapable of making sound decisions.

Most Citizens today have forgotten what the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence means.  There is little wonder why when daily we are bombarded with news media, the acting POTUS, and Congress telling us we live in a democracy instead of the Republic that was established here.  Under a democracy those governing have much more power than those in a republic.

re⋅pub⋅lic

/rɪˈpʌblɪk/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [ri-puhb-lik] Show IPA
–noun
1. a state in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them.
2. any body of persons viewed as a commonwealth.
3. a state in which the head of government is not a monarch or other hereditary head of state.
4. (initial capital letter) any of the five periods of republican government in France. Compare First Republic, Second Republic, Third Republic, Fourth Republic, Fifth Republic.
5. (initial capital letter, italics) a philosophical dialogue (4th century b.c.) by Plato dealing with the composition and structure of the ideal state.

Main Entry: de·moc·ra·cy

Pronunciation: \di-ˈmä-krə-sē\
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural de·moc·ra·cies
Etymology: Middle French democratie, from Late Latin democratia, from Greek dēmokratia, from dēmos + -kratia -cracy
Date: 1576

1 a : government by the people; especially : rule of the majority b : a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections
2 : a political unit that has a democratic government
3 capitalized : the principles and policies of the Democratic party in the United States
4 : the common people especially when constituting the source of political authority
5 : the absence of hereditary or arbitrary class distinctions or privileges

Note the subtle differences. In a Republic, the governing is invested in each person. In a Democracy it is a majority rule. This is a critical difference to note.  By subtle rule changes and media bombardment and incorrect utterances, our government has sought to wrest the rights and power of each individual away and manipulate the masses to change our governments ability to make laws and consolidate power.  We must come back to our Republic foundations of governing.  Only then will We the People have a sure form of government.

And what does all this have to do with impeaching the supreme court justices who have betrayed us?  EVERYTHING!  If we allow ourselves to be manipulated by those with all the money we will destroy ourselves.  This is the goal of the New World Order.  Changing our Republic to a democracy is only one step.  Giving privileges to those companies who have no reason or right to have them is another.  These justices were bought off.  The four who stood against them and were out-voted knew this and have extreme reservations and fears.  These four we need to keep. It is imperative that we reserve the rights of Citizens FOR Citizens and not have corporation given the same power, with all their financial means, to compete with us.

Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit

By ADAM LIPTAK

Published: January 21, 2010

The 5-to-4 decision was a vindication, the majority said, of the First Amendment’s most basic free speech principle — that the government has no business regulating political speech. The dissenters said that allowing corporate money to flood the political marketplace would corrupt democracy.

The ruling represented a sharp doctrinal shift, and it will have major political and practical consequences. Specialists in campaign finance law said they expected the decision to reshape the way elections were conducted. Though the decision does not directly address them, its logic also applies to the labor unions that are often at political odds with big business.

A vindication of the First Amendment? NO, it was a betrayal of Citizens at the most fundamental levels of our foundations. A corporation is not alive, it is a thing, it is a business. It is OWNED, nor has it EVER had freedom!  Something that is OWNED doesn’t have any rights whatsoever!  A business is NOT a person and cannot have the right to Free Speech! Even the dumbest yahoo out there must know that. To think that this is a good decision, (not the question asked of the courts in the first place), is an affront to WE the PEOPLE! Citizens of this country should be up in arms and threatening to lynch these betrayers of all we have stood for in over two centuries.

Contact your Senators and Representatives and tell them to IMPEACH these justices!

Brain Dead Senate Re-elects Bernanke

“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” Albert Einstein

Did you need more proof that Dumb, Dumber and Dumbest were large and in charge of the Senate?  The latest proof is the Senate re-election of Ben Bernanke as Chairman of the Federal Reserve.  Just what medication are these people on?  Do stupid pills come in mega doses?  They must if those elected to serve our needs elect those responsible for its downfall, not once, but twice!

Here are a few statistics for you to consider about Ben Bernanke and his ability to lead the federal reserve:

1. Since Bernanke took office the S&P index has declined 35%
2. He has been in charge of the biggest financial decline since the Depression
3. Latest unemployment rates are skyrocketing.  As of December that was 10.0%
4. Economy has fallen into a DEEP Recession
5. Bernanke is a scholar of the Great Depression.  A guide to the future?

Doesn’t that just give you all kinds of confidence in the man’s ability to lead us out of trouble?  How about your confidence levels in those of the Senate???  If I had any it would have fallen off the chart.  The latest unemployment figures show the following:

1. Adult males-out of work 10.2% .
2. Adult Females out of work 8.2%
3. Teenagers out of work 27.1 %

And those are just the ones getting unemployment benefits, not those who have fallen off the rolls because their benefits ended. The reality is that these figures should be doubled.  In December, 4 in 10 unemployed workers were jobless for 27 weeks or longer. The civilian labor force participation rate fell to 64.6 percent in December. That number is only for those still receiving unemployment which means that the numbers are actually higher.  It also means that with this number 35.4% are being reported unemployed.

Bernanke confirmation photo

Bernanke is also a scholar of the Great Depression.  How better to understand how to bring an economy down than through the study of the worst possible time in united States history and implementing those concepts in the here and now?  Banks continue to fail at record levels. But the Senators believe Bernanke is the man for the job of restoring our economy.  The deadly duo of Bernanke and Geithner dominate our financial situation and show just how incompetant they are.

Robert Auerbach, Professor, Lyndon Baines Johnson School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin has written an article which tells us that those at the federal reserve intend to shred their records as the Audit the Fed movement gains strength.  How can Bernanke justify shredding records of financial transactions and have any credibility?   And the Senate thinks this is the man for the job???  Who are they trying to kid?  How much did they receive in kick-backs to pull this stunt and get away with it???  I definitely want some of what they are smoking!

Stop the Federal Reserve From Shredding Its Records

Should the policymaking committee of the most powerful peacetime entity in the United States government be allowed to destroy their source records? The Federal Open Market Committee of the nation’s central bank, an intricate part of the United States government may be continuing to destroy its source records, a policy it began in 1995 with an unrecorded vote -no fingerprints – conducted by then Chairman Alan Greenspan.

The FOMC controls the nation’s money supply, targets short term interest rates and since 1962 took it upon themselves to bypass the Congressional appropriations process and loan money to foreign governments. I have described [in Deception and Abuse at the Fed] how the FOMC mislead the Congress in 1962 when they began this activity. In 1995 they voted a $5 billion loan to Mexico to keep the peso from falling when the Congress would not appropriate the money and the Treasury did not have sufficient funds. The then secret transcripts reveal that some Mexican Yucatan oil collateral was to be used. The full deliberations are not available because that is when the FOMC voted to start destroying the source transcripts. When the announcement of the loan was made public the peso stopped falling and the loan was never consummated.

I knew they had lied about their transcripts for 17 years after they were forced to show them to me around the corner from Chairman Greenspan’s office in an investigation in which I assisted House Financial Services Chairman Henry B. Gonzalez. The Fed had said in 1976 they would stop making transcripts to avoid the Government in Sunshine laws. Although Governor Paul Volcker voted to end the transcripts, reportedly when he became chairman he stopped the staff from destroying them.

The federal reserve must keep things hidden or the Citizens of this country will revolt. And why doesn’t the media cover this stuff on a daily basis? It isn’t news apparently.  Can someone tell me what other financial agency is allowed to destroy financial records with impunity?  You would think the Internal Revenue Service might have something to say about this practice.  Oops, my bad, they are probably in charge of the IRS.

http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2006/05/mapping-sp-500-performance-since-1871.html

This graph shows just how steep the recession was predicted to be. What the real figures are I can only guess.  However, in 4 short years the economy has plunged to record lows.  How bad does it have to get before we try something different than the same thing different day stupidity that has gotten us here?  Does Congress have a clue that Americans are watching their every move and we aren’t as stupid as they hope?

It seems that those in Congress along with  Gheithner and Bernanke are highly paid professional liars, crooks and criminals.  Are you going to re-elect these fools to office again?

In January of 2010, 14 MORE bank failures. In 2009, because of the policies of the federal reserve, 136 banks failed.  How many bank failures does it take to show the utter incompetence of a person in a position of power? Shall we track back all the bank failures since Bernanke was appointed by dubya? were recorded.   Yet Bernanke was re-confirmed to his current position.  If Bernanke is doing such a bang-up job, why are banks still failing?  Do these failures not count when a person is considered for a job?  In what other industry does this type of failure not cost the person their job? Oh, that’s right, you don’t fire a phuck up, you promote him!

To see how the Senators voted click HERE: My opinion is that anyone who voted yes needs a permanent vacation!  There are 70 of these permanent vacation seekers.  Let’s make sure they get what’s coming to them shall we?

One serious question I have is why these banks are failing.  According to IPA news bank reserves in 2008 were approximately 68 billion dollars but as of December of 2009 this figure had risen to an incredible 1.14 TRILLION DOLLARS! How does that kind of increase shut down a bank?  Want to know why you can’t get a loan?  Because the banks are hoarding their/your money and getting paid interest on their holdings.  It is not in their best interest to loan you money.  What a con game huh?

I think all of Congress, both House and Senate need some serious shaking up.  The whole kittenkabootal needs to be let go for lack of intelligence.  Their immunities need to be stripped from them so that they are held accountable for the bills they pass.  They should be forced to take the same health insurance the rest of us have to use.  Maybe then they could actually do a good job.  But as long os those in Congress remain detached from the everyday working stiff, there will be NO bills passed that do WE the People any good.  I decided to look up the immunity clause that Congress has and found this interesting bit:

Privilege From Arrest This clause is practically obsolete. It applies only to arrests in civil suits, which were still common in this country at the time the Constitution was adopted. It does not apply to service of process in either civil or criminal cases. Nor does it apply to arrest in any criminal case. The phrase ”treason, felony or breach of the peace” is interpreted to withdraw all criminal offenses from the operation of the privilege.

Perhaps congress is counting on us believing in an old law?  If so, they are no liable to be held accountable for their stupidity.

The Obaminator was also involved in the strong-arming of those in Congress to re-elect the biggest financial failure in history.  Even Barry Madoff can’t compete with Bernanke’s financial double dealings and yet he is in prison.   Perhaps if we all became lawless criminals we would see some improvement in Congress?

Ben Bernanke Confirmation Vote: Senate Gives Fed Chair A Second Term

Dodd, other Senate leaders, and the White House, with the personal involvement of President Obama, cajoled senators reluctant to support Bernanke in a difficult political climate.

As the final vote came to a close, Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), the ranking Republican on the committee and a Bernanke opponent, noted to Dodd that a few people who had said they’d be no votes had changed their minds.

Dodd could be overheard in the press gallery correcting his terminology. “They were reconsidered,” Dodd said, as he and Shelby shared a laugh.

Dodd then turned to Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.), who was casting his aye vote, waved and said, “Thank you.” Bayh nodded back.

I found the statement of Senator Bernie Sanders to be enlightening: He talked with VPR news and in an interview with them made the following comments:

(Sanders) “I think it’s just very wrong to appoint somebody who was asleep at the switch, whose job is to protect the safety and soundness of our financial institutions and he didn’t do it. He failed and I don’t know that you reappoint somebody who failed so terribly at the most important thing that he’s supposed to be doing.”

“The idea that there is only one person in the United States of America who can run the Fed – no other economist out there – and Wall Street has said that there’s going to be a massive sell off unless we give them their guy. I don’t think that passes the smell test, I don’t think that’s what American democracy should be about.”

Senator Jeff Merkley was also heard to comment on the Huffington Post:

A coalition of rank-and-file senators from both parties made the case against Bernanke, arguing that he failed to see a housing bubble that blew up and brought down the economy, chose not to enforce consumer protection laws, blocked congressional attempts to obtain documents that would shed light on his actions before, during and after the financial collapse, testified on behalf of cuts in Medicare and Social Security, and failed to regulate the derivatives market, which nearly took down the global economic system.

“In short, Bernanke’s decisions over the last eight years — as a member of the Federal reserve Board, as [President Bush's] Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors, and as Chairman of the Fed — helped set the fire that destroyed the economy,” Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon) told his colleagues in a letter opposing his nomination.

At least some are thinking there. Too bad that money talks so much louder than common sense. It is highly apparent that those in Congress do not believe we will retaliate come election time.  I hope they get the biggest suprise of their lives then.  If the Senate and House actually worked for these united States, this country wouldn’t be where it is today.  Obama is part of the problem and not likely to actually help American Citizens with anything.  The Good-Ole Boys club has got to be retired.  Citizens can’t afford these men and women in charge of anything, let alone passing confirmation of proven destroyers of our economy.  Bernanke is a bad man, no matter how you look at him.

Latest Illegal Alien News

"Illegal is anything that is against the law including drug trafficking, smuggling, terrorism or crossing the border into a country. Undocumented is anything that can no longer be verified including unemployed American workers who no longer qualify for unemployment benefits and are no longer counted in statistics. What a sorry nation we are becoming when we allow corporate political correctness to pervade our daily speech. Illegal means illegal." -- Peter Romanenko, Waco, Texas

As everyone who reads this blog knows, I’m against illegal criminal aliens from whatever country they come from.  But the truth is that over 85% of those who come here illegally are from Mexico.  I don’t make those numbers up nor did I create the flow of illegal aliens from Mexico.  The silent invasion of Mexicans into this country makes me mad.  The fact that big corporations are buying off those supposed to protect American Citizens while mouthing platitudes to us makes me mad.  I refuse to consider amnesty until every Citizen of this country is employed again.  I refuse to consider amnesty period!  Those who break our laws to get here only deserve jail and deportation and I’m not going to change my mind.  I’m not alone either.  Millions of Citizens in this country feel the same way.  We will continue to speak out against those complicit in the silent invasion of our country and the commission of crimes against Citizens until someone back in D.C. hears us or we fire the lot.  That means the Obaminator too.

I don’t know of any other country on this earth that has faced this kind of invasion while the government turns a blind eye to the criminals and at the same time turns the latest surveillance equipment on its own Citizens as though WE were the criminals.  Congress, DHS, Obama, all of them turn a blind eye to this problem.  While millions of American Citizens are out of work, losing homes, vehicles, health insurance, you name it, Congress is flooding billions of dollars to support the illegal criminal aliens who have crossed our borders illegally.

U.S. RUNNING HUGE DEFICITS WHILE GIVING BILLIONS TO ILLEGALS

By Frosty Wooldridge
January 28, 2010
NewsWithViews.com

Take a look at these figures: NBC reported 26 million Americans unemployed or working half time because they cannot obtain a full time job. Countless millions lost their homes to foreclosures in the past three years. At the same time, 35 million Americans subsist on food stamps. Yes, you may check Google for that figure. Our national debt spirals upward at $12 trillion.

In the same breath, last month, our U.S. Congress injected around 200,000 to 238,000 legal and illegal immigrants into this country. Month in and month out! Year in and year out! They injected 2.4 million last year and they will inject another 2.4 million in 2010. Most go on welfare and many stay on the public dole.

From numbers usa there are some interesting short videos and articles:

Emergency Room Treatment for Illegal Aliens in Las Vegas Costs Taxpayers $2 Million per Month

Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 1:18 PM EST -

New Study Shows Negative Impacts of Illegal Immigration on America’s Teens and Young Adults

Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 10:48 AM EST -

NumbersUSA’s Chad MacDonald at the Pasadena Anti-Amnesty Tea Party

Duration: 2 min 4 sec

Americans Fired, Foreign Workers Hired

Or how about those in Congressional Committees who swear they are on the side of the Citizens of this country while doing everything they can to make sure illegal criminal aliens get what American Citizens can’t?

Update on Illegal Alien Healthcare Vote

Duration: 2 min 31 sec

Here are the names of those working AGAINST the American public while trying to make us believe they have OUR interests at heart.  These Congresswomen and men are aiding and abetting in the commission of crimes against the united States of America.  Remember them.  Contact them.  Let them know you are mad and not going to take it anymore!  Why re-elect a criminal to office?  Check out the federal codes for illegal aliens HERE What part of that doesn’t Congress understand???  And check out the Energy and Commerce Committee who voted for healthcare coverage for illegal criminal aliens below:

Membership

The following Members have been selected to serve on the Energy and Commerce Committee in the 111th Congress:

Henry A. Waxman, CA, Chair
John D. Dingell, MI, Chair Emeritus
Edward J. Markey, MA
Rick Boucher, VA
Frank Pallone, Jr., NJ
Bart Gordon, TN
Bobby L. Rush, IL
Anna G. Eshoo, CA
Bart Stupak, MI
Eliot L. Engel, NY
Gene Green, TX
Diana DeGette, CO, Vice Chair
Lois Capps, CA
Mike Doyle, PA
Jane Harman, CA
Jan Schakowsky, IL
Charles A. Gonzalez, TX
Jay Inslee, WA
Tammy Baldwin, WI
Mike Ross, AR
Anthony D. Weiner, NY
Jim Matheson, UT
G.K. Butterfield, NC
Charlie Melancon, LA
John Barrow, GA
Baron P. Hill, IN
Doris O. Matsui, CA
Donna M. Christensen, VI
Kathy Castor, FL
John P. Sarbanes, MD
Christopher S. Murphy, CT
Zachary T. Space, OH
Jerry McNerney, CA
Betty Sutton, OH
Bruce L. Braley, IA
Peter Welch, VT
Joe Barton, TX, Ranking Member
Ralph M. Hall, TX
Fred Upton, MI
Cliff Stearns, FL
Nathan Deal, GA
Ed Whitfield, KY
John Shimkus, IL
John B. Shadegg, AZ
Roy Blunt, MO
Steve Buyer, IN
George Radanovich, CA
Joseph R. Pitts, PA
Mary Bono Mack, CA
Greg Walden, OR
Lee Terry, NE
Mike Rogers, MI
Sue Wilkins Myrick, NC
John Sullivan, OK
Tim Murphy, PA
Michael C. Burgess, TX
Marsha Blackburn, TN
Phil Gingrey, GA
Steve Scalise, LA

If your Congressman/woman is listed give them a call and let them know just what you think of their policies and the betrayal you feel.  If we don’t tell them they will continue to believe they are safe in their jobs.  These people have decided that American Citizens don’t need or want their jobs. That American Citizens must pay for the criminal illegal element to have healthcare insurance, food stamps and housing assistance while American Citizens wind up in tent cities. And these men and women think this is a WONDERFUL Plan!!! And, they support Obama who constantly supports the criminal illegal aliens and amnesty!

Do you realize that 5 Million Jobs have been lost and over 26 MILLION Citizens of this country are out of work while Congress pumps in 125,000 foreign workers per month to take what jobs exist here? But congress isn’t concerned because it doesn’t affect them or their lifestyles.  Congress gets free health care, NOT INSURANCE but HEALTHCARE, an income that supports them, and job security.  These individuals need to be fired and we need to keep firing anyone who supports illegal criminal aliens and the programs that support them!

Help Unemployed Americans by Suspending Immigration

Duration: 3 min 56 sec

This needs to stop. What possible reason could those in Congress have to continue a practice that hurts We the People so much?  Join with NumbersUSA and let your voices be heard.  69% of American Citizens want illegal criminal aliens stopped and those here deported NOW!  Speak with your votes and Congress will be forced to hear us.

There was some good news though.  It seems that Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is looking to ship those illegal alien criminals already in California prisons back to Mexico and incarcerate them there.  He claims it will save money for Californians.  I say once those Mexican citizens are back in Mexico, let the Mexicans take care of their room and board.

Schwarzenegger: Ship Inmates to Mexico

Jan. 26, 2010

(CBS) California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger floated a novel, if unofficial, proposal Monday that could save the state $1 billion – build and operate prisons in Mexico to house illegal alien inmates.

“We pay them to build the prisons down in Mexico and then we have those illegal aliens be down there in a prison. … And all this, it would be half the cost to build the prisons and half the cost to run the prisons,” Schwarzenegger told the Sacramento Press Club, according to a San Francisco Chronicle report.

Like I said, they belong to Mexico, let the Mexicans pay for their own. They don’t deserve three squares and free room and board on OUR CITIZEN’S dollars. Mexicans are prospering just fine and don’t need our aide. Let’s save our money for those AMERICAN CITZENS who are out of work and need help.

You see California is under a court order to reduce its prison population by 40,000 inmates.  They are a little over crowded there.  A good plan would be to stop imprisoning those who use marijuana, which doesn’t impair you, isn’t addictive, and has many medical benefits.  I’m sure that alone would reduce the population by half.

Governor looks south of the border for prisons

Wyatt Buchanan, Chronicle Staff Writer

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

California is currently under a federal court order to reduce its prison population by 40,000 inmates over the next two years. A federal judge installed a receiver in 2006 to oversee inmate health care in state prisons, finding that substandard care led to the death of about one prisoner per week.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/26/MNV11BND6M.DTL#ixzz0e1SU8cIG

Could it be any clearer that these criminal illegal aliens MUST GO? A roundup and deportation has been done three times before. Why not now when American Citizens desperately need what jobs there are?

OPERATION WETBACK

By Jon Christian Ryter
January 27, 2010
NewsWithViews.com

Three times in the history of the United States US Presidents took what would today be considered a politically unpopular position by rounding up and deporting illegal aliens to create jobs for US Citizens. The first attempt occurred shortly after the banker-induced Stock Market Crash of 1929 when President Herbert Hoover ordered the round-up and deportation of illegals by the US Immigration and Naturalization Service. The program, dubbed “Operation Wetback,” was carried out without any protests from US government-funded Hispanic advocacy groups—since there were none.

The Hoover roundup sent over one million Mexican illegal aliens packing—freeing up jobs for out-of-work US citizens. In addition, some 47 thousand Mexican nationals who were in the country legally, with visas, also opted to leave due to rising animosity by out-of-work Americans for any foreigner in the United States with a job. Operation Wetback was launched in the Southwest: Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas. But deportees also came from Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, and New York. Since Mexican illegals tried hard to remain under the radar screen, few of them traveled far beyond the border States, thus we can assume that most of the deportees from the States north of the Mason-Dixon line were legal residents. During the Hoover years, immigration to he United States was virtually stopped.

Seems to me like it is that time again! You want a job? Are you out of work? Then get on the phone and make some noise!  These criminals have NO sympathy for the plight of u.S. Citizens, why should we have any for them???  They want work, go home!  We owe nothing to Mexican nationals.  Especially those here illegally.

Here is my quote of the day one more time:

“Illegal is anything that is against the law including drug trafficking, smuggling, terrorism or crossing the border into a country. Undocumented is anything that can no longer be verified including unemployed American workers who no longer qualify for unemployment benefits and are no longer counted in statistics. What a sorry nation we are becoming when we allow corporate political correctness to pervade our daily speech. Illegal means illegal.” — Peter Romanenko, Waco, Texas

What could be clearer?  There is nothing else to say.  Those supporting illegal criminal aliens need to move to Mexico also.  You show me one Citizen of this country who is allowed to follow only those laws they want to.  It ain’t happening!  The Citizens of this country are bombarded with surveillance systems on the roads and highways, when flying and or using transit systems.  Not to mention the illegal actions by those government agencies who can’t understand that criminal illegal aliens should never be here to begin with!

It is a criminal offense to aid or abet/be an accessory to/ a crime.  Those in Congress, the acting POTUS are, in effect, aiding and abetting the commission of crimes which are federal in nature.

Aiding and Abetting/Accessory

---

A criminal charge of aiding and abetting or accessory can usually be brought against anyone who helps in the commission of a crime, though legal distinctions vary by state. A person charged with aiding and abetting or accessory is usually not present when the crime itself is committed, but he or she has knowledge of the crime before or after the fact, and may assist in its commission through advice, actions, or financial support. Depending on the degree of involvement, the offender’s participation in the crime may rise to the level of conspiracy.

For example, Andy draws a floor plan of a bank, knowing of Dan’s intention to rob it. After Dan commits the robbery, Alice agrees to let him store the stolen money at her house. Both Andy and Alice can be charged with aiding and abetting, or acting as accessories to the robbery.

Go ahead and ask your congress person if they are an accessory to the commission of a crime, that of harboring illegal criminal aliens, housing or feeding them at taxpayer expense, or passing budgets that taxpayers have to pay for these criminals.  Thier names are part of each bill passed, each budget passed, and if they turn a blind eye, they are an accessory to the crime committed.

Impeach The Supreme Court, Betrayal Of The Constitution And Citizens

The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants. ~Albert Camus

Corporate lobbyists now have the green light to spend, spend, spend when it comes to laws passed in their favor.  This is a perfect example of what money can buy, judges!  What Citizen of this country can compete with a ruling which allows special corporate interests to spend unlimited funds to get their way?  It would be nice if those in Congress had the balls to *just say no* but we’ve never seen it happen, nor are we ever likely to now.  This 5-4 decision is another blow to our beleaguered Constitution and the united States as a whole.  Nor am I in the least surprised after what I have seen so far.  Greed and corruption has become synonymous with those who are supposed to protect the Citizens of this country.  Of course, it might help if we stopped talking democracy and realized we have a REPUBLIC first and foremost.  Think of the Pledge of Allegiance. It sure doesn’t say “And to the Democracy for which it stands…”

Call me suspicious, and I’m sure I’m not the only one, but doesn’t it seem a bit convenient that this decision should come up now, just before the 2010 elections???  No?  Boy have I got some ocean-front property for you here in Phoenix!  The ramifications of this decision by those we need to impeach just ripples outward.  Net neutrality, corporate gains, enslavement of the Citizens of this once great nation, etc.   Go ahead, pick a topic and then consider whether or not this decision can affect it. It is good to see that I’m not the only one concened with, and outraged by, this decision.

The Court’s Blow to Democracy

Editorial

Published: January 21, 2010

The ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission radically reverses well-established law and erodes a wall that has stood for a century between corporations and electoral politics. (The ruling also frees up labor unions to spend, though they have far less money at their disposal.)

< SNIP >

In 1907, as corporations reached new heights of wealth and power, Congress made its views of the relationship between corporations and campaigning clear: It banned them from contributing to candidates. At mid century, it enacted the broader ban on spending that was repeatedly reaffirmed over the decades until it was struck down on Thursday.

You can read a copy of this landmark betrayal here: Or, if that disappears, you can view it here: Citzens United v Federal Election Commission

I suggest everyone read this document as it is enlightening.  The parallels that the justices raise, Tokyo Rose, etc. are astonishing to say the least.  Outrageous is more likely though.  And to think we always believed that the supreme law of the land upheld the Constitution.  Just another straw to break the camel’s back, (or in this case these united States).  Those who voted for this decision should be immediately impeached.  No more questions asked, no more judgments allowed, the case of corruption in the Judicial system is made perfectly clear!  You can read about these people, their backgrounds, who nominated them, etc.  Here:

Where does it end?  Anti-trust laws have been gutted, net neutrality is in peril, our news media doesn’t report news anymore only using sound bites that have been approved by those who are paid off by special interest groups, (corporations), our food isn’t safe, we are herded like cattle into gated communities that don’t make me feel safe, only caged, and all of this is corporation owned.  People are being usurped by corporations, our rights given us by our Creator assigned to non-persons, corporations.  Is there no one in that corrupt D.C. world that stands for human beings anymore?  Have they all gone mad?  It sure appears so to me.

Our rights, I say again, came from GOD, our CREATOR, not by the supreme court, not by congress, and certainly NOT by corporations or even the Constitution!  Our Creator doesn’t recognize something that makes money as being real, so how can they be given the same rights as those belonging to human beings?  Impeach the Supreme Court NOW!

A Supreme Act Of Judicial Treason Against The People Of The United States, And What We Can And Must Do About It

By any fair legal definition, the decision yesterday by The Supreme Court 5 constitutes nothing less than an act of TREASON against the people of the United States. Having read and analyzed the entire 183 page decision and all of its concurring and dissenting opinions ourselves, we are fully prepared to support this accusatory conclusion.

Having so grossly abused its jurisdiction by presuming to decide a question expressly WAIVED by the petitioner in the Court below (p 12), this rogue Supreme Court ruled for the FIRST time that NO corporation can be constrained from unlimited influence over our  elections. And even assuming that the Court intended the decision to only apply to American corporations, the Court expressly DECLINED (pp
46-47) to reach the question of whether foreign ownership stakes in American corporations should likewise be given carte blanche to put their thumbs on the scales of our democracy.

Action Page: Corporations Are NOT The People
http://www.peaceteam.net/action/pnum1029.php

Action Page: Impeach The Supreme Court 5
http://www.peaceteam.net/action/pnum1030.php

Or on Facebook:

Corporations Are Not The People:
http://apps.facebook.com/fb_voices/action.php?qnum=pnum1029

Impeach The Supreme Court 5:
http://apps.facebook.com/fb_voices/action.php?qnum=pnum1030

There is no more time to allow anymore corruption, greed, avarice, graft, corporate money, or campaign contributions to run this country. We the People are paying the price of being lax, asleep and content sheeple!  It is time to take back our government and make it our servant once again.  The current administration is an abomination to this once great nation.  We the People are the only ones who can bring it back on track.  Those in Washington D.C. are apparently too far gone in greed and corruption to be able to pull themselves back from the brink of our destruction.

Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit

By ADAM LIPTAK

Published: January 21, 2010

President Obama called it “a major victory for big oil, Wall Street banks, health insurance companies and the other powerful interests that marshal their power every day in Washington to drown out the voices of everyday Americans.”

The justices in the majority brushed aside warnings about what might follow from their ruling in favor of a formal but fervent embrace of a broad interpretation of free speech rights.

Let us be very clear about what the Constitution does and does NOT do. First, the Constitution stipulates that our rights came from our Creator, not a document. The Constitution DOES protect those rights, but it never has and never will. grant them. The First Amendment simply guards against anyone, Congress or the Courts, from usurping the rights to freedom of speech or freedom of religion.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/01/supreme-court-gives-corporatio.html

We cannot afford to sit by idly while these types of decisions are made.  We MUST make Congress and the Courts understand that we know, and are aware of, our rights and where they come from.   But most of all, that we will no longer tollerate the abuses, neglect, and corporate dollars that buy our government and those supposed to represent us.  Go to the links above and make your voice heard!

As a Citizen of this once-great nation you have a duty to uphold our founding documents even if those in power refuse to.  These traitors must be removed with all haste.  And they will fight us.  They are so steeped in corruption they can no longer see clearly, react honorably, nor understand the meaning of our founding Constitution. These are soulless beings, not even human by most standards.   Let the 2010 elections speak loudly and decisively to those who would accept payoffs instead of honor, greed instead of gumption, and slay the betrayers of our country and our Constitution,  through our elections!  Let the message ring loudly across this land; “We will NOT submit to tyranny or corruption by those we elect!”

While we may not have the dollars to spend that those corporations have, we have our vote.  While we cannot make sure in the polling places that our vote will count, we can make sure it is recorded through secondary means and FORCE them to acknowlege our votes.  We can take our government back and make it serve us once again.

Obamacare Whistleblower Tells Of The Sellout Of Americans

It has come to light how the Obaminator and Congress are selling out American Citizens in favor of Big Pharma and the fiat dollars that PHaRMA throws at them.  We now know why the Obaminator and Congress don’t want to live under the same rules they set for us.  But is this really such a revelation after all we’ve been seeing from this administration and others before it?  Not really.  We expect malfeasance, corruption, greed and avarice to be part of those who supposedly have our interests at heart.  And isn’t that just about the saddest thing you can imagine from those we elect to serve our interests?  Are you awake yet you who voted for this Obamination?  Have the rose colored glasses been lifted from your eyes?  Do you see the real man yet or shall we continue to support this ineligible, corrupt impostor?

Although there are those who are diligently trying to squash the availability of internet data, we are still able to get our information via the web.  There has been much speculation concerning Obama-care.  Most of us are highly suspicious of anything coming out of Washington D.C. anymore.  We are angry, concerned, and skeptical of anything they try to shove down our throats.  They call us names, think to dismiss us, but we are getting through however they may hate to listen.

Consider this latest article from CommonDreams.org:

Whistleblower Reveals How Health Insurers Can Game New Insurance Bill

Though Senate bill cuts ‘pre-existing conditions,’ it still allows insurance companies to create ‘pre-existing’ categories to raise rates

by Brad Jacobson

The Democrats’ healthcare overhaul, billed as a monumental game-changer for Americans’ health insurance coverage, provides numerous loopholes for health insurance companies which will allow them to raise rates to protect profit margins, a health insurance whistleblower says.

Wendell Potter, a twenty-year veteran of the insurance industry and former vice president of communications for Cigna, warns that current healthcare legislation does nothing to prevent the insurance industry from continuing its ongoing practice of increasingly shifting healthcare costs to consumers.

In other words, We the People are being screwed again by those intended to protect us.   The more I read on this the clearer it became that this is just another one of those instances of “same story, different day.”  I tried to view the video that was supposed to show Mr. Potter’s interview, but while the video is there, it s nothing but silence.  That in itself is damning.  I then went to look for the transcript of the testimony.  You can view it either from Bill Moyer’s Journal or click on the following link and get the PDF file.  Click Here for PDF And just in case it disappears online as so much else has you can download your own copy here: PotterTestimonyConsumerHealthInsurance

Testimony of Wendell Potter, Philadelphia, PA Before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation
June 24, 2009

Those goals included covering all Americans; eliminating underwriting practices like pre-existing condition exclusions and cherry-picking; the use of community rating; and the creation of a standard benefit plan. Had the industry followed through on its commitment to those goals, I wouldn’t be here today.

Today we are hearing industry executives saying the same things and making the same assurances. This time, though, the industry is bigger, richer and stronger, and it has a much tighter grip on our health care system than ever before. In the 15 years since insurance companies killed the Clinton plan, the industry has consolidated to the point that it is now dominated by a cartel of large for-profit insurers.

And we all know what a cartel is now don’t we? Thugs and thieves. What does that say for those that work for these cartels? What does it say for Congress?  And if they knew this in 2009, why is it still being shoved down our throats today as a good thing?  Because of Wall street, those thugs and layabouts who steal money from us legally.  As with getting rid of the Federal Reserve, we need to get rid of those on Wall Street and the BS they tell us.  None of it is real or worthy of our attention.  Those gambling with the stock market have seen the results of their folly, yet Wall Street is too big to fail…

The irony only gets deeper when  you consider what the healthcare bill is called:

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Can’t you just hear the violins playing in the background, angel’s with wings and harps, benevolence oozing from every aspect of this bill? Oops, sorry, the sarcasm was dripping all over my keyboard!  Consider these benevolent items in the bill:

1. Like mandatory volunteerism, our government has decided that EVERY Citizen in this country WILL purchase healthcare insurance that won’t be any better than it has been in the past.  The only difference is that now if you decide to opt out you will be fined 2.5% on your payroll by the government. (pg 29 lines 23-25)
2. If this *insurance* was so good, why isn’t the Obaminator, his family, and ALL of Congress forced to accept it also?
3. Why is it that a person who can afford a second insurance policy besides Medicade won’t be allowed to purchase it?  How does that serve American Citizens who want more coverage than Obamacare is willing to give? (pg 16 lines 11-20)
4. At best Obamacare will only cover 70% of PREVENTIVE CARE.  What happens when you get sick?  You pay!
5. Only acceptable plans will be allowed to insure an individual.  All competition goes away, no more shopping around, price fixing is assured.
6. While pre-existing conditions will no longer be a reason to be denied coverage, prices will go up to cover the cost to companies and place the burden on the individual once again.  (pg 19 lines 18-25)
7. Why is it that after the Obamacare goes into effect, Health insurance policy makers won’t be allowed to write any more policies?  How does that benefit We the People?
8. Why is it that hospitals will now be forced to ask permission of the government to expand beds available for patients?  (pg 317 lines 21-25 and 318 lines 1-3)

An excellent article I found with these issues explained and expanded on can be found at the link just below:

ObamaCare: A Physician’s Point of View On The Negative Ramifications of America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009

Friday, July 24, 2009 21:40

This author has taken great pains to read the document that Congress has decided is a good idea and put it into perspective. The worst part to me though is that in a supposed *Free* society the government can mandate anything at all to We the People instead of being our servants and asking our permission. Oh, that’s right, this isn’t a free country any more.  Why is the media only touting the selling points of Obamacare instead of the reality?  Well, that is a dumb question now isn’t it?  Of course the answer is that the Insurance Cartels are paying them not to.

Now, go to Govtrack and do a search on Healthcare and you will be amazed.  There are 228 bills currently under consideration all having to do with Healthcare.  Healthcare for the elderly, veterans, nurse shortages, drugs, education, and on and on and on…  Next thing you know the government will be in your bedroom watching you have sex and telling you if you are doing it correctly.  Oh, sorry, they can already do that.  Haven’t you had a gut full of the servant telling the master what to do yet?  I’m sure they can, and will,  come up with more for ya real soon.

How much longer will it take before the Citizens of this country realize how broken the two party system is?  When will they wake up to the corruption and greed that rulse those who sit and debate our fates.  I watched a movie on HBO the other night, Dealth on a Factory Farm and all I could think about after it was over was that the government looks at us like that farm looked at the hogs.  We are the pork that those lawmakers live on and our lives are the ones that can and will be tossed aside or extinguished as they desire.  Are we even human to those *on the hill?*

Ask yourself if those in Washington D.C. are doing the best they can or selling us out.  Examine closely if your lives are better or worse than even 10 years ago.  And don’t be giving them the excuses that things change and people change, times have changed.  Because then the only thing I can say is you have bought into your own train wreck of a future and sold your kids down the tubes after you.

Did you read this article?

Internal Memo Confirms Big Giveaways In White House Deal With Big Pharma

A memo obtained by the Huffington Post confirms that the White House and the pharmaceutical lobby secretly agreed to precisely the sort of wide-ranging deal that both parties have been denying over the past week.

The memo, which according to a knowledgeable health care lobbyist was prepared by a person directly involved in the negotiations, lists exactly what the White House gave up, and what it got in return.

How come articles with this information don’t take center stage in the media? Why do the media consistently gloss over all this important information? Because they too are being paid off to keep things quiet. Put it out there but don’t make a big deal out of it. Then it can always be said later that we were told but we did nothing about it.  Nor does congress ever fix the stuff it breaks.  It just says it will some time later…  Been there, done that, got the tee shirt, no thanks!

The only way that Congress and the illegal POTUS are going to listen is vote them out.  No more trusting in their promises.  No more listening to campaign speeches, it is all lies meant to BS you into letting the elite do as they please.  We need to shake them all up and get rid of them.  Vote in your neighbor next door who keeps his word, does what he says he will do.  Anyone with a history, family or otherwise, of politics should be carefully examined before trust is in any way offered.  Better yet, fire the lot and start over.

The Articles Of Freedom

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

American Citizens are waking up to the fact that their government has become corrupt, tyrannical, and has attempted to subvert, dismiss, and disparage the Constitution as a document long past its prime.  The Constitution of these united States is the supreme law of the land.  All those elected or appointed swear allegiance to it and to uphold and defend it:

Oath

I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.5 U.S.C. §3331

There are no exceptions to this oath, everyone from the president on down swears it, and yet they have all willfully, and with absolute intention, committed treason by breaking their oath to this same Constitution with items such as executive orders, unConstitutional bills passed in Congress, and transgressions against the sovereign Citizens of this country, failure to safeguard our borders against the invasion of Mexicans and other aliens, or treaties which hurt the Citizens of this country.   Our military personnel take this oath.  The Justices from the Supreme Court down to the lowliest local Judge take this oath.  Yet time and time again we have watched them break their oaths and work against our country, the Constitution, We the People, and even God itself.  All in the name of greed, assumed power, and tyranny.

Singly and in groups We the People have filed grievances against those abuses which our Constitution guarantees will be heard and answered.  Those in authority have failed to answer.  And that my friends is their admission to guilt.  By their very failure to answer have they condemned themselves.  Hoping and waiting is not getting anything accomplished.

In March of 2009 several  Citizens Grand Juries around the country indicted Obama saying he is ineligible to be POTUS, has committed fraud, and is therefore NOT president of these united States.  This is no small matter.  A Citizens Grand Jury is the supreme law of the land being made up of Citizens of this country who can make a decision, seek evidence that is hidden, and make decisions that are not up for discussion by anyone, even the supreme court.  For more on the Citizen Grand Jury, click HERE:

“‘A presentment, properly speaking, is an accusation, made by a grand jury of its own mere motion, of an offence upon its own observation and knowledge, or upon evidence before it, and without any bill of indictment laid before it at the suit of the government. Upon a presentment, the proper officer of the court must frame an indictment, before the party accused can be put to answer it.’”

But in 2009 a most amazing event took place.  We the People got tired of the powers that be and elected representatives from each State to gather together and hammer out a response and a plan of action to take against this problem.  The result was that the Articles of Freedom were drafted.  They are a must read!  Every American Citizen must wake up, band together, and firm their resolve to take back our country from those who have crept into power and who have betrayed us at every turn.

A copy of the document can be found HERE: Articles-of-Freedom.12.24.2009

Save it, read it, and pass it along.  Adopt it and be prepared to defend it.  Together we stand, divided we fall.  A test of our resolve is coming.  What will you do?

The Articles of Freedom are written notice that We the People will take our country back one way or another.  While we prefer peaceful action, legal action, we are prepared to meet force with force if given no other option.  Nor will we compromise in any way with the current federal or State government officials, judiciary, or the executive branch.

So far we are being ignored by those in Congress, the acting POTUS, the Judiciary branch and the authorities in all Federal and State governments.  But we will not stop.  Our resolve is firm.  Our terms are clear and unyielding.

Articles of Freedom

Declaration and Resolves of Continental Congress 2009

In Defense of a Free People, the time has come to reassert our God-Given, Natural Rights and cast off tyranny…

Let the Facts Reveal: The federal government of the United States of America was instituted to secure the Individual Rights of our citizens and instead now threatens our Life, Liberty and Property through usurpations of the Constitution. Emboldened by our own lack of responsibility and due diligence in these matters, government has exceeded its mandate and abandoned those Founding Principles that have made our nation exceptional;

Our servant government has undertaken these unconstitutional actions in direct violation of its enumerated duties, to the detriment of the People‟s liberty and the sovereignty of our Republic;

Over many years and spanning multiple political administrations, the People who have, in good conscience, attempted to deliberate our grievances and voice our dissent against these offensive actions through both Petition and Assembly, have been maligned and ignored with contempt;

The People of the several States of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming, justly alarmed at these arbitrary and unconstitutional actions, have met as Citizen-Delegates, and sat in a general Congress, in the city of St. Charles, Illinois;

Whereupon we, as these Citizen- Delegates, have gathered in defense of Divine Justice, Liberty and the principles of limited government, now stand in clear recognition of the Supreme Law of the Land – the Constitution for the United States of America;

Therefore, We demand that Government immediately re-establish Constitutional Rule of Law, lest the People be forced to do so themselves; and we hereby serve notice that in the Defense of Freedom and Liberty there shall be NO COMPROMISE to which we shall ever yield.

21 November 2009

Sadly, the States of North Dakota and Oklahoma are not part of this signing.  Apparently those Citizens do not care about restoring our Constitution to its proper place.  I cannot say for sure since I do not know anyone in these States.  But it is very sad that they are not a part of this great endeavor.

Tom DeWeese wrote an amazing article about the time spent at the Continental Congress.  I hope you will take the time to read it.  Here is a small portion of it:

What happens now to the tireless efforts of delegates? The work has only just begun, as each member of Congress and each state legislature will be personally presented with a copy of the Articles of Freedom as the demands of the People. It is, of course, expected that most officials will again ignore the documents.

That’s why the most important work will be to get the Articles of Freedom into the hands of millions of Americans across the nation, asking them to join the effort to bring pressure on Congress for action. The Continental Congress 2009 intends to enjoin a critical mass of at least 15million Americans to sign the Articles of Freedom. The documents will be used to give the TEA Party rallies a specific goal. Candidates for office, hoping to gain the support of the recharged freedom movement will be asked to sign the Articles of Freedom as their pledge to uphold the Constitution if elected.

If we Americans don’t claim and exercise our right to hold our servant government accountable, then each of our natural, un-alienable, individual rights will atrophy and die. Indeed, this process is well underway.

© 2010 Tom DeWeese – All Rights Reserved E-Mail: ampolicycenter@hotmail.com

Time for American Citizens to band together and take back our country, our government, and expel those who would subvert and destroy her. We the People are the supreme rulers of this land. By our sufferance do we elect others to  govern us.  The Constitution is the supreme law of the land.  Any actions taken outside its defined borders are null and  void, as though they had never existed at all.  Those who dishonor either Constitution, country, or We the People, belong in the deepest, darkest prisons we can find. Abu Ghraib sounds like a fine place for them. They will not be granted life long pensions from us, no secret service body guards, only a jail cell and to forever be reviled and cast aside to live in ignominy their lives through.

Let the word be spread throughout the land, We the People Unite!

Will Fox Channel Win Blooper Of The Year Award?

Fox Channel Logo

It seems that the Fox channel has lost its mind.  Hiring Sarah Palin for a news contributor?  Sarah Palin in known more for her stupid comments, inaccurate statements, and gaffes than for a news worthy contributor.  What could have possessed those in control of Fox to hire her?  Who decided she has anything news worthy to add?

Factually challenged news channel hires factually challenged Palin

January 11, 2010 2:46 pm ET

The New York Times reported that Fox News has hired Sarah Palin as a contributor who “will appear on the network’s programming on a regular basis as part of a multi-year deal” and “will host an occasional series that will run on the network from time to time.”  Fox News hired Palin despite her months of pushing false claims and bogus information, including the “Lie of the Year” that the Democrats’ health care bill includes “death panels.”

Of all the articles advertising this momentous decision by Fox Execs, this one I couldn’t resist using since it is in line with my views on this topic.  So let’s look at some examples of Sarah Palin’s brilliant commentary, let’s pull up some of her enlightened statements:

The People Don’t Elect U.S. Presidents, God Does

Upon being asked by James Dobson if the McCain ticket’s precipitous slide in the polls gets her down:

… [it] strengthens my faith, because I’m going to know, at the end of the day, putting this in God’s hands, that the right thing for America will be done at the end of the day on Nov. 4. So I’m not discouraged at all.

… and I can feel it too, Dr. Dobson. I can feel the power of prayer, and that strength that is provided through our prayer warriors across this nation.

Ah yes, the always helpful “prayer warriors,” whose appeals to the Almighty actually count for more than the average American citizen’s vote. Apparently the next president of the United States will be handpicked by God.

God may not have rewarded her with the Vice Presidency but he made sure his favorite village idiot still got a staring spot with Fox!  I’ve seen some strange things laid at the feet of God, but this is out there even for me!   Then again, if God can be used as a cause for unceasing war, torture, and all the other atrocities on this earth instead of life, anything is possible…  For myself I was always under the impression that the Electoral College elected the President and Vice President.

Sarah Palin, Idiot or victim of the news media?

When asked by a 3rd grader what the Vice President did, Palin replied with the following:

Q: Brandon Garcia wants to know, “What does the Vice President do?”

PALIN: That’s something that Piper would ask me! … [T]hey’re in charge of the U.S. Senate so if they want to they can really get in there with the senators and make a lot of good policy changes that will make life better for Brandon and his family and his classroom.

Do you suppose that those in the Senate would agree to this brilliant statement? I somehow doubt it. Although the Senate can use all the help it can get, (they are dumber than a box of stupid rocks most of the time), saying that the VP is in charge is like saying the sky is green.  And Fox believes Palin has anything news worthy to contribute?  Perhaps they are going for comedy of the year awards?

Then there was Sarah Palin’s proud assertion that the Alaskan legislature had cleared her of all wrongdoings in the “Troopergate Affair.”  Remember she had Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan fired after he tried to fire her former brother-in-law, State Trooper Mike Wooten?  Palin said she was acquitted of all wrong-doing, the legislature  said otherwise.

“Well, I’m very, very pleased to be cleared of any legal wrongdoing … any hint of any kind of unethical activity there,” the governor said from her car on the way to a campaign stop in Philadelphia.

The investigation was ordered by the Legislature in July to examine the circumstances under which Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan was terminated. The results of that probe, released Friday, concluded she abused her power in pressing for the firing of an Alaska state trooper once married to her sister but was within her authority in firing Monegan.

Denial does seem to be a favorite of those in public office. She sounds perfect for a commentator position on the Fox News Channel! Maybe we actually have a winning combination here?  Did anyone watch her interview with Katie Couric? A few gems from that interview are:

Couric: And when it comes to establishing your world view, I was curious, what newspapers and magazines did you regularly read before you were tapped for this — to stay informed and to understand the world?

Palin: I’ve read most of them again with a great appreciation for the press, for the media –
Couric: But what ones specifically? I’m curious.

Palin: Um, all of them, any of them that have been in front of me over all these years.

Couric: Can you name any of them?

Palin: I have a vast variety of sources where we get our news.

But she can’t remember a single one?  How about NBC who was interviewing her?  OK then, moving right along…  At a fundraiser in North Carolina Palin had this to say about the news:

At those times on the campaign trail when sometimes it’s easy to get a little bit discouraged, when, you know, when you happen to turn on the news when your campaign staffers will let you turn on the news … Usually they’re like “Oh my gosh, don’t watch. You’re going to, you know, you’re going to get depressed.“

Yup, we have brilliance incarnate here for our edification. Palin seems to be the poster child for the dumbing down of America.  And then the classic denial and attack because Palin’s stupidity was undeniable after the interview with Katie Couric:

Sarah Palin Slams Katie Couric as “Badgering,” Biased in New Memoir

Friday – November 13, 2009 – 9:19am

According to the Associated Press, Palin, 45, says McCain campaign aide Nicolle Wallace urged her to sit down with Couric, 52, who is also a working mother. Palin says she was told that Couric liked and admired her. The interview would be a favor to Couric, whom Palin notes had the lowest ratings of the network anchors and whom Wallace said suffered from low self-esteem. Palin writes that she almost began to “feel sorry” for Couric.

But during the interview, Palin said she was surprised to find Couric acting condescending, biased and “badgering.”

Ever notice how it is never the statements the person makes that is to blame for their troubles but the mean old interviewer?  Denial is the stock in trade for a politician. How in the world did Palin manage to get elected Governor in the first place?  What in the world were the citizens of Alaska thinking?  Didn’t anyone pay attention to what Palin had to say?  And now what in the world is Fox thinking even considering her for a position as contributor to their station?

A look at Sarah Palin’s bio on Wikipedia gives some clues as to her backers and how she got where she is today.  Here it is:

Sarah Louise Palin born February 11, 1964) is an American politician, author and political commentator who served as the 11th Governor of Alaska from 2006 until her resignation in 2009. She was the Republican nominee for Vice President of the United States in 2008.

Palin was a member of the Wasilla, Alaska, city council from 1992 to 1996 and the city’s mayor from 1996 to 2002. After an unsuccessful campaign for Lieutenant Governor of Alaska in 2002, she chaired the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission from 2003 until her resignation in 2004. She was elected Governor of Alaska in November 2006. Palin became the first female governor of Alaska and the youngest person ever elected governor of that state.

Oil is money and power all rolled into one.  She obviously has connections with both or someone this inept couldn’t possibly have gotten elected to so many different offices.  And you would think she would have learned how to do interviews, handle speaking engagements, by the time she was asked to run as the  VP candidate under the McCain banner.  Someone screwed up.

But the question remains; What is Fox thinking in hiring Sarah Palin?  Are they going for comedy relief?  Do they believe that Sarah Palin is capable of intelligent additions to their news program?  Are their ratings slipping so much they need someone, anyone, even as bad as Sarah Palin to garner viewers?  Are we to take this seriously?  Enquiring minds want to know…

Maybe you would like to leave your thoughts with Fox?  Here are some ways to get a hold of them.

Fox News Channel 1211 Ave. of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Fax: (212) 301-4229

Fox News: 1-888-369-4762

Email: yourcomments@foxnews.com

I have verified the above information for you through the Fox website.  Let them know what you think of this deal with Sarah Palin.  I can’t imagine watching anything she is a part of with any seriousness.

FDA Approved, Not What It Used To Be

Watching the latest commercials trying to garner confidence in their products  through the use of *FDA Approved* has become a source of sarcastic humor.  FDA approval used to mean something back in the 60s, 70s and even the first part of the 80s, kinda like “In God We Trust.”  But sadly that is no longer the case.  While we may still trust in God, there is no way you should trust the FDA. After all, the FDA now approves cigarettes and everyone knows cigarettes are bad for you right?  Wasn’t that the policy of the FDA for years upon years?  Yet now the smoking industry is regulated by the FDA.  This implies that cigarettes are now good for you!  FDA approval should come with its own warning label which should read something like this:

WARNING, THIS PRODUCT IS FDA APPROVED.  USE WITH EXTREME CAUTION AND AT YOUR OWN RISK.

PLEASE NOTE:  All medications treat symptoms, NOT THE DISORDER!  The cause is never treated or you won’t need their products any more.  Can’t have that!

One of the products with commercials out is Alli, the weight loss supplement.   You can view the commercial here: A humorous look at the side effects of alli can be found HERE: But from the Alli website you can see this:

Side Effects of Alli

The potentially uncomfortable, but not serious side effects which may occur with Alli have been well documented.  They relate specifically to the drugs ability to supress the absorption of fatty acids into the body, and the disposal of unused dietary elements.  Some users may experience some of the following side effects :-

Oily stools.As the Alli weight loss pill reduces the production of an enzyme in the intestine, which converts fatty dietary elements into fatty acids, some fat from digested food may not be processed.  As a result the body will find a way to release basic fat content from the body, usually excreted naturally.  Due to the nature of the left over substances, stools can often appear oily and emit an unfortunate odour.

What isn’t clear from the above is that you will now find an oily substance in the toilet along with whatever else is deposited there.  Ahhhh, the bliss of the uniformed…

Flatulence. Another means by which the body has been known to release unwanted waste is by flatulence.  While this is a totally natural and harmless release, it can prove potentially embarrassing and uncomfortable as the customer may not have full control of their bowels at all times.

Guess what?  You may find skid marks in your shorts due to farting.   I love how they disguise the problems with this drug so the consumer won’t be alarmed yet no one can say you weren’t informed.  But how many of us really want to fart chunks?  Not I, that’s for sure.  And the alternative?  The natural hard way…

Vitamin deficiency. Even though Alli is specifically structured to take out the fatty content of dietary intake, some vitamins may consist of fatty content, which may not be absorbed into the body.  It is therefore recommended that while using taking Alli, the user also takes a daily dose of vitamin tablets.

So the fact that this product will strip out vitamins necessary for the healthy functioning of our bodies, whether those vitamins are over the counter or by prescription, aren’t going to help you regardless because the alli won’t let you absorb them PERIOD!  And the recommendation of taking a vitamin pill to boost your vitamin content doesn’t make any sense if the taking of Alli will stop you from getting any benefit of the needed vitamin!  Do they teach doctors about the duh factor?  Apparently not if your doctor is stupid enough to prescribe a vitamin pill while you are on alli!  You go Alli!  Keep raking in the money from fools and idiots.  Oh, and by the way, Alli has an IMMEDIATE EFFECT on your body.  Be prepared!

Asthma products and their commercials are all over the TV.  One has to wonder if they are promoting the products or the condition itself.  The side effects of these drugs are serious, often more so than the condition itself.  I’ve suffered from asthma for many, many years but about three years ago I made up my mind to stop taking the medications I was on.  I had one for immediate relief of symptoms and one for long term relief.  Let’s look at the problems with these products:

Side effects: facial edema, rash, herpes simplex, nervousness, nausea, nasal irritation, dry mouth, hoarseness, wheezing, nasal pain, delayed growth in children, irritation of the throat, coughing, hoarseness, candidiasis in the region of the oropharynx or the larynx, nasal burning and stinging, aftertaste, hoarseness, sore throat, cough, Candida (yeast) infections, change or loss of sense of smell or taste, nausea, headache, diarrhea, allergic reaction (including rash, hives, itchiness and bronchospasm), dry nose, nose bleeds, yeast infection in the mouth, sore throat, serious cortisol suppression, growth suppression in children, eosinophilic pneumonia, eosinophilic vasculitis, vasculitic rash, worsening pulmonary symptoms, cardiac complications, increased risk of glaucoma, suspected to be a co-factor in asthma deaths, tremor, inner agitation, heart palpitation, muscle cramps, headaches, premature contractions during pregnancy, psychotic reactions, liver dysfunction and damage, increased heart rate, blood pressure, heart beat irregularities, chest pain tremor, nervousness, worsening of bronchospasm (life-threatening), allergic reactions: skin rash, hives, swelling, bronchospasm, and anaphylaxis (life-threatening), worsening of diabetes and lowering of potassium, potentially fatal heart complications, systemic corticosteroid effects such as hypercorticism and adrenal suppression, Cushing’s syndrome with moon face, truncal obesity, acne, psychiatric disorders, menstruation disorders, osteoporosis, muscular atrophy, and other myopathies,hypertension, edema, hyperglycemia, cataracts, glaucoma, aseptic bone necrosis, pancreatitis, delayed wound healing, sleep disturbances, nycturia, nausea; gastrointestinal bleeding, dermatrophy, cerebral pseudotumor, congestive heart failure, convulsions, impaired wound healing, oss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, trouble concentrating tachycardia, palpitations, extrasystoles, headaches, tremor, nervousness, excitability, sleep disturbances, gastroesophageal reflux, changes in liver functioning, headache, infections, nausea, diarrhea, numbness, tingling, pain, worsening respiratory symptoms, liver damage (yellowing of skin or eyes, unusual tiredness, abdominal pain); Churg-Strauss syndrome: can be very serious; if dose is reduced watch for the following symptoms: fever, muscle aches, pains and weight loss, headache, abdominal pain, rash, dyspepsia, dizziness, diarrhea, sinusitis, and ear ache, gastroenteritis, cough, nasal congestion.

Long Term Use: glucose intolerance, psychiatric disturbances, cataracts, depressed pituitary-adrenal functioning, osteoporosis, permanent loss of sense of smell and/or taste, dangerous complications mostly affect the heart (arrhythmias) and the central nervous system (convulsions) and are frequently lethal, liver damage (yellowing of skin or eyes, unusual tiredness, abdominal pain).

Well, that was quite the list of side effects now wasn’t it? Is it just me or do you see the irony of taking a medication to alleviate the asmatic symptom of wheezing with a medication that causes it?

And then there was this side note:

Expert Warns Against 5 FDA-Approved Drugs

At least five medications now sold to consumers pose such risks that their sale should be limited or stopped, said a government drug reviewer who raised safety questions earlier about the arthritis drug Vioxx.

In testimony Thursday before the Senate Finance Committee, Food and Drug Administration revier David Graham cited Meridia, Crestor, Accutane, Bextra and Serevent. Drug makers defended the use and safety of their products.

The links above will show you just how bad these products are.  If the FDA had done its job, these products would never have gotten into the public market and people would not have died from their introduction into the populace.  However, once again, the FDA failed in its mandates…

And of course the manufacturers would defend their products!!!  They don’t give a shit about the consumer, so long as that consumer continues to use their products and after all, they are FDA Approved!!!  Nor do we usually hear about the problems with the FDA or their products.  Did you know the FDA is currently in court because of this?  I’ve already accused the FDA of being paid to murder us in FDA, Murder for Money…  I stand by my accusations.

I would hope that by now we all know the high cholesterol drugs hoax.  For those of you with your head in the sand, I feel sorry for you wasting your money and killing yourselves.  That’s what you are doing.  Read Here:

And what about the unsafe drug testing the FDA approves of??? Are you part of one of those tests?

FDA Condones Unsafe Human Experiments

Wednesday, October 03, 2007 – Byron J. Richards, CCN

The New York Times reports that the FDA fails to ensure the safety of millions of people who participate in experimental clinical trials.  In fact, the government doesn’t even have any idea how many of these experiments are taking place.  The FDA haphazardly follows up on less than 1%, and when problems are found little or nothing is done.

The New York Times outlines several horror stories of individuals stuck in an unscrupulous system, as well as the near total lack of FDA oversight.  This is one more example of FDA ineptitude – which is comprised of a very long list of transgressions against the citizens of this country.  Let’s call a spade a spade, the FDA is little more than a police force bully serving as the gatekeeper to profits for elite companies at the expense of human health.  Taking any drug is like playing Russian roulette.

Now, do you see why I think the FDA is a major joke? Why does this agency even exist? To give credence to those drug manufacturers who pay them. It certainly isn’t to protect the consumer’s health, to promote good health, or be a part of any grand or nobel consumer defender.  Time and time again the FDA fails miserably to fulfill the goals it was designed to encompass.  Read their mission statement here:

About FDA

What We Do

The FDA is responsible for protecting the public health by assuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, medical devices, our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, and products that emit radiation.

The FDA is also responsible for advancing the public health by helping to speed innovations that make medicines and foods more effective, safer, and more affordable; and helping the public get the accurate, science-based information they need to use medicines and foods to improve their health.

Some of the recent celebrity deaths we know were caused by prescription drugs are: Michael Jackson, Brittany Murphy (flu), Heath Ledger, and the list goes on.  And yes, I agree that Michael Jackson was abusing certain drugs, but they still killed him and they were all legal drugs.

What about Alzheimer drugs?  These so called chemical cosh drugs have been linked to over 1800 deaths in the UK.  Routinely these drugs are given to the elderly to keep them quiet for hospital or care staff and NOT for the benefit of the patients.  Read Here: This then begs the question of whether or not the hospitals or care facilities are abusing sedatives where the elderly are concerned.  The chemical-cosh drugs, or anti-psychotics, have a host of problems associated with them, obviously, death being the worst.  That’s a rather final side effect if you ask me.  But hey, they were on the way out anyway right?  What’s the big deal?  For the FDA it is obvious, no big deal at all!

Drugs like prozac have a long list of side effects: Insomnia, Nausea, Weakness, Headache, Diarrhea, Drowsiness, Anxiety, Nervousness, Shakiness, Dry mouth, Decreased sex drive, Weight loss or gain (and they claim it is our eating habits), Indigestion, Dizziness, Sweating, Impotence, Ejaculation problems (got your ED meds?), Premature Ejaculation, Flushing, Abnormal Dreams, Constipation, Gas, Vomiting, Fever or Chills, Vision Changes, Chest pain, High Blood Pressure, Taste changes, Suicidal Thought or behaviors, Panic Attacks, Hostility and Aggression, and on and on.  There are literally three pages of side effects for this chemical cosh drug…

And what of sleeping aides?  Drugs like Ambien, Lunesta, etc., all have equally daunting side effects.  We’ll start with Ambien:

Diarrhea; dizziness; drowsiness (including daytime drowsiness); “drugged” feeling; dry mouth; headache; nausea; nose or throat irritation; sluggishness; stomach upset. Severe allergic reactions (rash; hives; itching; difficulty breathing; tightness in the chest; swelling of the hands, legs, mouth, face, lips, eyes, throat, or tongue; unusual hoarseness); abnormal thinking; behavior changes; chest pain; confusion; decreased coordination; difficulty swallowing or breathing; fainting; fast or irregular heartbeat; hallucinations; memory problems (eg, memory loss); mental or mood changes (eg, aggression, agitation, anxiety, depression); severe dizziness; shortness of breath; suicidal thoughts or actions; vision changes

Have you noticed a re-occuring theme for some of these side effects?

How about Lunesta?

Lunesta may cause a severe allergic reaction. Stop taking Lunesta and get emergency medical help if you have any of these signs of an allergic reaction: hives; difficulty breathing; swelling of your face, lips, tongue, or throat. Lunesta will make you fall asleep. Never take this medication during your normal waking hours, unless you have at least 8 hours to dedicate to sleeping.

Some people using this medicine have engaged in activity such as driving, eating, or making phone calls and later having no memory of the activity. If this happens to you, stop taking Lunesta and talk with your doctor about another treatment for your sleep disorder.

Lunesta can cause side effects that may impair your thinking or reactions. Until you know how this medication will affect you during waking hours, be careful if you drive, operate machinery, pilot an airplane, or do anything that requires you to be awake and alert. Do not drink alcohol while you are taking this medication. It can increase some of the side effects of Lunesta, including drowsiness. Lunesta may be habit-forming. You may have withdrawal symptoms if you stop taking this medication after taking it over several days in a row. FDA pregnancy category C. This medication may be harmful to an unborn baby. Lunesta can pass into breast milk and may harm a nursing baby.

These are just a few of the products the FDA endorses. Yet the same FDA tells us repeatedly, vehemently, and consistently NOT to use natural products. A natural product rarely has side effects.  A natural product tends to work with your body and not against it as these designer drugs do.  Does anyone besides me think this is a problem?  The FDA certainly SEEMS to work for the drug companies and NOT for the people they are supposed to safe-guard.

Now, I haven’t even touched on drug interactions either.  Certain drugs should never be taken with other drugs.  How often are we warned of those consequences?  In the small print on labeling?  Who can even read those?  You need a magnifying glass just to read them.  So how is it you are supposed to know there is a drug interaction problem???

Since this post is getting too long I’ll stop here with a few last links for you to consider.  It seems that the FDA has now been pulled into court for its failures…  Check this out: And if that doesn’t work, (sometimes I get an error message), here is the document: FDA on trial

Other links of interest: Antacids, acid blockers, etc.

Obama Moves For New World Order…Again

Clever tyrants are never punished. Voltaire

As America travels down the road to dissolution via the traitor Obama, does anyone still believe he is a good man?  A man that We the People can look up to?  The sheeple will say yes, of course he is, but those of us who think for ourselves know better.  Before you call me a racist understand that I voted for the Black Woman for president.

Executive Order 12425 is just another shining example of how the New World Order is coming to fruition.  Unless we strip the Obamination of his power the destruction of our beloved country will continue.

Besides being patently illegal per the Constitution of these united States, executive orders are a back end run around Congress and We the People.  So what is anEO?  When did EO’s start?  I found the answer on ThisNation.com.

Executive Orders are controversial because they allow the President to make major decisions, even law, without the consent of Congress. This, of course, runs against the general logic of the Constitution — that no one should have power to act unilaterally. Nevertheless, Congress often gives the President considerable leeway in implementing and administering federal law and programs. Sometimes, Congress cannot agree exactly how to implement a law or program. In effect, this leaves the decision to the federal agencies involved and the President that stands at their head. When Congress fails to spell out in detail how a law is to be executed, it leaves the door open for the President to provide those details in the form of Executive Orders.

Now we have a bit of history for the EO’s and the controversy behind them. The link above will give you much more information than I will here. Back to Executive Order 12425 and the slap in the face of Law enforcement here…

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release

December 17, 2009

Executive Order — Amending Executive Order 12425

EXECUTIVE ORDER
- – - – - – -
AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 16, 2009.

The most appalling thing about this order is that it  give a foreign policing agency the rights to do whatever they want on American soil while remaining immune from prosecution.  Even our own police force and military  doesn’t have these immunities.  These foreign police can do whatever they want to anyone in this country and we can’t do squat about it.  Isn’t that lovely?  Is this what you voted for?

Want to see a shining example of Interpol?

Mugabe’s ‘brutal’ police chief lands role at Interpol

By Basildon Peta Southern Africa Correspondent

Augustine Chihuri, Zimbabwe’s police commissioner, who is accused of being a driving force behind President Robert Mugabe’s brutal repression of opponents, has been appointed honorary vice-president of Interpol.

The Tory foreign affairs spokesman, Michael Ancram, called on the Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, to protest against Mr Chihuri’s “staggering” appointment. In a letter to Mr Straw, he said: “During the brutalisation and rape of Zimbabwe, the police force has stood by and done nothing to uphold law and order. Indeed, the police force is cited in many cases of human rights abuses.“

Imagine Augustine Chihuri, this pillar of Interpol, to be on u.S. soil! Well if the puppet Obama has his way Augustine Chihuri and his like will be able to be here and in charge of a police force the American people can’t touch legally.  Isn’t that a comforting thought to take to bed with you each night?   The NWO couldn’t get what it wanted from our own police force, thanks in part I’m sure to Oath Keepers,  so they pulled the Obaminator’s strings, (or maybe it was Obama’s own idea), and the traitor signs over policing powers to an outside force which is immune from our own laws. Just something else he can outsource.  What a guy! All hail the tyrant!  I wonder how our own police forces and military men and women feel about this?

And did you ever wonder at the origins of Interpol?  Let’s look:

Interpol and It’s Nazi Past

June 18, 2009 by Marquis Canaday

During the Nazi annexation of nearby lands, the 8th Army of the German Wehrmacht crossed over into Austria unopposed militarily. But, the German Wehrmacht instead received cheers from the Austrian people along with Nazi salutes, flags and flowers. The invasion went on to become known as the Blumenkrieg (War of Flowers). In addition to that, when noon came on March 12, 1938 – the President of Interpol, Dr. Michael Skubl, was removed from office by Reichsfuhrer – SS Heinrich Himmler, and replaced with Dr. Steinhausl.

Nazi Germany considered Austria a part of itself. In spite of some dissidents, there were Austrians who served in the armies of Nazi Germany. Furthermore, on March 12, 1938, Nazi Germany merged Austria into itself as being part of the Heim ins Reich movement; One which became one of the factors leading up to the Second World War.

Isn’t this wonderful news? Why can’t we seem to jail those that betray this country? Why can’t we put tyrants and puppets in prison where they can learn it doesn’t pay to break our laws? Because the government is owned, nothing but a puppet itself. Those within the highest places of power have been bought and paid for. They sold their souls for the gold and silver of Judas.

Why aren’t the citizens of this country being told about all this?  Those in power don’t want them to know.  After all, sheeple don’t need to think for themselves when the government can do it for them.  Isn’t that what Obamacare and Cap and Tax farces are?  But the sheeple bow and scrape and say “Look how progressive we are!  We elected a black man!”  Stupid, stupid sheeple!  If Obamacare was so good, then why isn’t the Obaminator and his darling family going to be a part of it?  Oh no, he and his have opted out, as has all of Congress.  Obamacare isn’t going to be good enough for the ruling elite.  Is there no one with any balls to stand against these criminals and take them to justice?  Oh, my bad, those bought and paid for include the judicial system.

I would rather be subject to extermination than live in a country of slaves.  And we are headed there.  As lofty as the United Nations “International Declaration of the Rights of Man” seem to be and yet the language is such that it gives lip service only to human rights.  If it were otherwise Darfur and other atrosities world wide would not be so prevailant.  Oh ya, we can trust Interpol!

Genocide in Darfur, Sudan

Since February 2003, the Sudanese government in Khartoum and the government-sponsored Janjaweed militia have used rape, displacement, organized starvation, threats against aid workers and mass murder. Violence, disease, and displacement continue to kill thousands of innocent Darfurians every month.

And the Obama puppet dances!

http://www.rejecttheherd.net/forum/big-brother/ministry-truth/obama-shuns-dalai-lama-please-china

Would you pay the Obaminator’s price to be a puppet head of a government?  Do you think his kids will still look  up to him years from now when they realize their father was responcible for the destruction of their beloved country or will they believe something else?  What legacy will he leave them?  Was the price Obama paid going to be that his family never know what a traitor he is?  Will the sheeple ever wake up?

Obama the puppet by choice and design all the way…

Long ago I decided that the Obamination was a sociopath.  He fits the description given to a tee:

Profile of the Sociopath

# Glibness and Superficial Charm

# Manipulative and Conning
They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible. They appear to be charming, yet are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims.

# Grandiose Sense of Self
Feels entitled to certain things as “their right.”

# Pathological Lying
Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing and even able to pass lie detector tests.

# Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt
A deep seated rage, which is split off and repressed, is at their core. Does not see others around them as people, but only as targets and opportunities. Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who end up as victims. The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.

# Shallow Emotions
When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.

# Callousness/Lack of Empathy
Unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others’ feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.

# Irresponsibility/Unreliability
Not concerned about wrecking others’ lives and dreams. Oblivious or indifferent to the devastation they cause. Does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.

# Lack of Realistic Life Plan/Parasitic Lifestyle
Tends to move around a lot or makes all encompassing promises for the future, poor work ethic but exploits others effectively.

# Criminal or Entrepreneurial Versatility
Changes their image as needed to avoid prosecution. Changes life story readily.

There are more definitions listed but I cannot say whether they fit or not since I do not live in his household   For that reason I left them out. This man knows no shame, guilt or remorse for ruining this country.  To the Obaminator it is all good and he is the god of his universe.  I do not recognize him as POTUS.  Traitor, usurper, illegal alien, those are what I consider obama to be.

UCC 1-308 Under protest!

FBI Get’s Their Man, Or Another Screw Up?

Watching KPHO is a formal joke around here.  I say they are nothing but bit line schmucks, spouting whatever the current party line is and trying to make it sound like real news.  After all, who else would call the invasion of a country by criminal illegal aliens nothing but poor people looking to better their lives and cut the crap out of the one Sheriff doing his darnedest to see that the laws aren’t broken by those same criminal elements?  However, when I heard this story last night it made me curious.  Just how accurate is technology and how smart is the FBI?  I have my doubts as to the ability of those in the FBI or any other government agency.

Here is the story:

The “Blue Collar Bandit” (left) from a bank camera; Chris Evans on the right.

Family: Man at work, not robbing banks

• Reporter: Kim Holland
• Web Producer: Bill Diven

ALBUQUERQUE (KRQE) – An Albuquerque man remains the FBI’s prime suspect in a series of Phoenix bank robberies despite his claim to an iron-clad and electronic alibi.

The FBI arrested Chris Evans at his Albuquerque home earlier this month calling him the “Blue Collar Bandit” who has held up at least seven banks in Arizona. That bandit terrorized tellers in the late summer pointing guns at them and getting away with a load of loot.

You can watch a short video of the report HERE:

If you believe the latest technology babble you will understand that these hand scanners, (which provide this man’s iron-clad alibi), are infallible.  So why is the FBI so sure they have their man?  Why, because they are the FBI!  Don’t confuse them with the facts now, they have their man!

Hand and optical scanners are supposed to make it impossible to fudge results.  If they are used for an employee to sign in, that employee is supposed to be there with no way for them to fake the results.  Hand scanners use a 3D image of the hand to check for seven different points of comparison.  If the hands don’t match, you don’t get passed the scanner.  Chris Evans’ boss put one of these scanners into his business and during the robberies these scans say Evans was in New Mexico.  Short of donating one of his hands to a bud to get himself logged into the system while robbing a bank, it isn’t possible for him to have been in two places at once.

When I was in junior high I had a doppleganger in the same grade as I was.  We looked so much alike in fact I got slapped by a teacher once for something she had done.  Being yelled at by a teacher calling out someone else’s name and being expected to answer to that other name somehow failed to impress me.  When asked why I hadn’t responded to my name I would inform the teacher that when she or he actually used my correct name I would indeed respond.  Until then they couldn’t call out someone elses’ name and expect me to answer to it.  Is this another of those incidences?  How lucky for the actual bank robber if he can have his crimes pinned on someone else.

Again, let’s not confuse the FBI with the facts here that prove Chris Evans was at work during the robberies!  Let’s ignore the security measures Chris’ boss put into effect to make sure employees weren’t fudging on their time cards.  Let’s just rule out the current technology designed to stop counterfeiting.  Most of all, let’s make sure the wrong guy gets to go to jail because SOMEONE HAS TO!  And it is patently obvious that the FBI hasn’t a clue.

What good is the technology if those in law enforcement can discount it so easily?  What’s the point of having this stuff if it is all BS?  I will admit that the pictures are close, but then, they were designed to be that way.  Two guys smiling may look like identical twins, even if they aren’t.  But I see a thinner face, different nose structure, and other differences between the blue collar bandit and Chris Evans.  Nor can I see teeth or eyebrows in the blue collar bandit which would allow me to better compare to see if they are indeed look-a-likes.

Even dubya felt biometric technology was important enough, and reliable enough, to sign a presidential directive concerning them.  That being the case, why is the FBI arbitrarily ignoring the facts?  See the presidential directive below:

NSPD-59/HSPD-24
National Security Presidential Directive (NSPD)-59 / Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD) – 24, “Biometrics for Identification and Screening to Enhance National Security,” was signed by President Bush on June 5, 2008. This directive establishes a framework to ensure Federal departments and agencies use compatible methods and procedures in the collection, storage, use, analysis, and sharing of biometric and associated biographic and contextual information of individuals in a lawful and appropriate manner, while respecting privacy and other legal rights under United States law. This directive builds upon existing coordination efforts and helps to ensure that high-level plans are implemented throughout government. This directive does not impose requirements on State, local, or tribal authorities, or on the private sector. It also does not provide new Federal authority for collection, retention, or dissemination of information, or for identification and screening activities.

So this writer has to wonder at the FBI thumbing it’s collective nose at the technology.  If it isn’t as secure as the makers of these devices claim them to be, then why would the President want a standard created for them?

Hand Scanner used by Chris Evan's boss

Biometric Hand Scanners work as a means of identification. Hand scanning is gradually replacing photo identification in different aspects of our daily lives. Biometric hand scanners allow pass holders to enter a given secured area more quickly, prevent fraud and eliminate the need to wait in line to get photo IDs taken. There will always be a need to match a person to a pass and this is a new, quicker way to do it.

The process, called biometrics, uses electronic devices to verify identity by recognizing unique characteristics such as fingerprints, hands and the iris of the eye. The technology is used widely in verification systems at airports and security-sensitive facilities.

For more information on this HP2000 click here:

According to the manufacturers this handy, dandy gadget is more useful and more secure than the largest SUV is around a passenger on the road.  The manufacturer’s say you can’t fudge on your time card with this little baby.  And you can’t get your buddy to punch you in either.  And while I cannot find the model above on the FBI’s website for biometrics, they do indeed use the technology.  The FBI uses both single print and ten print/palm devices that it has certified as being up to the task of identifying persons with whom it is  used.   The FBI equipment doesn’t seem to be as useful as the one Chris Evans’ boss installed for his company, but hey, what do I know???

I think it is also very clear to everyone that the FBI, being yet another government agency, uses the equipment from those manufacturers that they make deals with.  It doesn’t mean it is the best equipment, or the most economical, just that this is the stuff they have *deals* for and not that any other equipment isn’t just as good or even better.

I also noted one comment I’d like to include here from the KPHQ article:

I was a police officer for over 14 years and have had hundreds of hours of training in investigations. You, however, dont need police training to see that this is not the same person. Looks to me like the FBI has some major cleaning up to do. Had I ever put together a case such as this, I guarantee no state judge would have ever signed off on a search warrant and I would be looking for a new job for arresting a man with no connection to the crime. A COMPLETE AND THOROUGH investigation should always be completed before arrests are made unless caught in the act. I feel sorry for Evans and his family and I hope the FBI moves at lightning speeds to make things right for this family. Time to step up, FBI, and admit your error and get back out there and get the real suspect!!!!

Except for maybe one or two commentators worried about FBI bashers the consensus of the others is that it is NOT a picture of Chris Evans that the FBI showed around.  If we could all be convicted on the basis of being a look-a-like, we’d all be in trouble I’m guessing.  The world just doesn’t have that many molds available to make distinct and unique faces.  Somewhere there is someone who looks JUST LIKE YOU too.

Most interesting to this writer is the FBI’s description of the Blue Collar Bandit:

The unknown male is described as a Hispanic male, 20 – 30 years, 5’11” to 6’0”, 180 lbs., average build, green plaid long sleeve shirt, beige khaki pants, beige camouflage fishing hat, carrying a silver semi-auto handgun.

I must be blind or something because Chris Evans appears to be a white male to me.  Then there is the fact that Chris Evans has no criminal history.  I realize that times are tough right now, but the guy IS working.  Why would he need to rob a bank?  Are we dealing with the keystone cops here or the FBI?  Someone seems to have really screwed the pooch here.  And I’m quite sure it wasn’t Chris Evans…  So why has the FBI got it out for Evans?  And, funniest part of all is that no mention has been made by the FBI about them having found the clothing this bandito is supposed to have worn for the robberies.  But then if you are going to accuse a guy who doesn’t have those clothes you aren’t going to want to make a big deal of that now are you?

Now, you all may say that Chris Evans worked for a plumbing place and so he could easily have arrived at work, done his time card, and then left to go rob banks all the way over in Phoenix, Arizona then turned around and gone back to work to clock out.  I’d say the work not getting done would be one clue as to why this would be impossible, but again, that’s just me.  I can’t find one good reason why the FBI has decided that Chris Evans is guilty.  It seems to me he is convenient, and a close enough match physically that they can get away with this.  And they will, they are the FBI.  Too bad the rest of us can’t do such shoddy work and call it good, pat ourselves on the back, and be ever so proud of ourselves that we’ve done our jobs.  Oops, my bad, my sarcasm is showing…

And what does Chris Evans’ boss have to say about all this?:

Is NM Man ‘Blue Collar Bandit’?

Several years ago, Crawford installed a $10,000 hand-recognition machine to make sure employees were honest on their time cards. Each employee has his or her own code and has to be identified by his or her individual handprint before the machine, which reads 95 different points on a person’s palm, will clock them in.

“The records don’t lie,” Crawford said. “He was here.”

McKinney agreed.

The FBI has these records.  They were turned over when Chris Evans was arrested.  So, with an iron tight alibi, why is the FBI so single-mindedly pursuing Chris?  Only the FBI can say for sure and they aren’t talking.  And just how will the FBI admit to accusing the wrong person?  I’ve never heard of that, have you?  Just another instance where the FBI is flat out wrong, as with going after Sheriff Arpaio, and they will never man up and admit it.  Perhaps Chris Evans will get lucky and the real punk will be dumb enough to get himself caught, but right now that guy is laughing his assets off at the FBI.  And frankly he should too.  It is a sad testamount to the times that the FBI has faked their own case with the wrong man.